9-11 box cutters 11 september utility knives

[Mark Kohut]

When a good writer has a midwestern Lutheran also not be in the towers that day,
he is saying "something" about people and the towers that day. Nature of careful, thematic writing. 
 
You are not right that "only a few paranoid Islamists had such a theory"...Read how pervasice it was/is
in the Middle East. See polls of Americans...
 
I thought fewer had some of the theories you've expounded but I was wrong but at least one unexpected
one...



On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 6:19 PM, Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net> wrote:
  
I don't see a lot of debunking going on. Some bunking, yes.  But this is a wild stretch to say that because Horst, the midwestern Lutheran with a penchant for TV biographies, ball games and futures divination, was gone on 9-11 this debunks a theory that only a few paranoid Islamists had.  You negate the obvious in the story and cling to very tenuous interpretations


Fiona
>>>> 
>>>> Pynchon debunks these conspiracy theories; these divisive theories
>>>> that say the Jews got out, the Arabs got out....the Bush people got
>>>> out. He debunks them and piles them in the landfill with the Bush
>>>> attack on Iraq.


On Nov 26, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Kai Frederik Lorentzen wrote:

> 
> Thanks for the explanation!
> 
> Yet still. In what way does the fact that Horst can't explain why he wasn't in his office discredit his considerations about put options and lopsided put-to-call ratios? Are these considerations "debunked"? Is Horst? Where?
> 
> Not saying that 'the actual nature of 11 September' is the primary theme of "Bleeding Edge" (or that Pynchon knows more about it than you or me), but neither is this novel an anti-truther-satire. Not even in the case of March.
>>>> 

-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20131126/99d51aa8/attachment.html>