BE: cracking DeepArcher

[Lemuel Underwing]

If it can somehow be construed as Da'at, then only in that negative sense?
I'm still just waking up over here, but if I recall correctly each of the
ten sephirot have a negative counterpart, like some sort of dark
inversion..?


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Rev'd Seventy-Six <revd.76 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Apropos of all the jewishness, emphasis on voids / absences (*are*
> excluded middles always bad shit?), and 9/11 number games:
>
> http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Da%27at_(Kabbalah)
>
> "10 and not 9, 10 and not 11," states the Sefer Yetzirah.
>
> Begging the question, is DeepArcher Da'ath? Or at least a facet of it?
> It's individuated enough, regularly likened to dreams and other
> mystical states-- including that popular consensual delusion referred
> to as reality --yet seems to regularly transcend all these.  Add to
> that, it's populated by those  pesky shells of the dead, the Qlippoth,
> forever stalking the periphery of our familiar-yet-irreal sphere, with
> them sometimes *bleeding over,* well...
>
> Do I get my No-Prize, Stan?
> -
> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20131004/401c3289/attachment.html>