Chabon on BE

[David Morris]

I also believe that religious doubt is central to GRs Pynchon. Doubt in the
non-existence of G-d.  I'd say the main difference between "crackpot
conspiracy theorists" and anarchists is the element of Hope.  Meaning that
anarchists know they are being watched and controlled, but aspire to break
free, maybe in a hot flash of real experience.

David Morris

On Sunday, October 20, 2013, Fiona Shnapple wrote:

> You've left out a very important element: uncertainty, the hope that
> almost anything might happen, even something magical, in religious
> terms, a miracle, in P's Catholic tradition,  the real presence of G-d
> in human affairs. The Romantic and Puritan belief in the divine
> presence is anathema to the Enlightenment, but in Pynchon, doubt is
> the essence of faith, of belief. The crackpot conspiracy theorists and
> anarchists are not cut from the same cloth.
>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
> > But Pynchon's main point about all these Zones is their brief existence.
> > Small temporary places beyond the reach of enslaving power.  Always to be
> > briefly enjoyed before those spaces are colonized or reclaimed.
> >
> >
> > On Sunday, October 20, 2013, Rich wrote:
> >>
> >> As I've said before Pynchon has left preterite somewheres
> >>
> >> On Oct 20, 2013, at 3:21 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> It is an analogy, and only one of many possible zones.  Not that I
> espouse
> >> this kind of zonal paradise.  It just seems Pynchon repeated model.
> >>
> >> On Sunday, October 20, 2013, Rich wrote:
> >>
> >> But what good is it if only accessible by the well connected (haha)?
> >>
> >> Hardly a paradise, no?
> >>
> >> rich
> >>
> >> On Oct 20, 2013, at 2:22 AM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think DA is supposed to be internet Zone, anarchy, a place w/o rules
> or
> >> rulers. Pynchon Paradise. What is it "for?"  Wrong question. What for
> do you
> >> want to make it?
> >>
> >> David Morris
> >>
> >> On Saturday, October 19, 2013, John Bailey wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah, I'm a bit confused about DeepArcher too... as far as I can tell,
> >> it's a program lodged in the deep web, which as you say is basically
> >> the "place" where IP addresses aren't connected to DNS so won't show
> >> up on any search engine, and you need a direct link or knowledge of
> >> the specific IP address to access it.
> >>
> >> So that kind of makes sense - DeepArcher is a program with Second
> >> Life-like aspects that can't be accessed unless you have the key. And
> >> later on the security of the fortress is compromised, and then the
> >> gates are just thrown open and it basically leaves the Deep Web and is
> >> accessible from the surface.
> >>
> >> What I really don't get is what the *hell* the program is for. A
> >> Second Life that only a handful of people can get into? And do what?
> >> The descriptions of Maxine's early journeys around the place make it
> >> seem like a point-and-click adventure game with no mystery to it or
> >> reason to play further. Except it has stunning graphics, for the
> >> era...
> >>
> >> At first I thought it was a navigation system for travelling through
> >> the Deep Web but that doesn't really seem right, since it would
> >> basically be a search engine with graphical interface for finding the
> >> IP addresses of places that aren't meant to be findable. Which would
> >> be exactly the thing that would pose a threat to the entire meaning of
> >> the Deep Web, even if you could erase your footsteps the way DA
> >> promises.
> >>
> >> Anyway, maybe that's the point - that this supposedly subversive
> >> method of total anonymity itself provides the architecture for control
> >> and surveillance and some sweet home shopping.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Michael Bailey
> >> <michael.lee.bailey at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Oct 19, 2013 7:09 PM, "Monte Davis" <montedavis at verizon.net>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Chabon is careless there. Ernie's capsule history is not
> *historically*
> >> >> baseless: yes, DARPA did fund some of the IT research leading to
> TCP/IP
> >> >> and
> >> >> packet switching. And yes, the Cold War justification for that
> funding
> >> >> *was*
> >> >> to develop a network technology that could "work around" servers
> >> >> knocked
> >> >> out
> >> >> by enemy attack, so that government could keep communicating.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > One of my other favorite authors, John Crowley, in _The Translator_
> >> > made the female protagonist's dad a darpa dude and evoked those times
> >> > wonderfully.
> >> ><-
> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20131020/1314fc45/attachment.html>