The Real Conspiracy

[David Morris]

This would drive me nuts if not understood as a commentary on the
political/historical realm.  Art there, not science.

On Tuesday, September 10, 2013, wrote:

> Tell that to the recipients of the chemical attack.  This sort of PM
> bullshit drives me nuts.
>
> There is never any objective reality to anything anywhere.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com>
> To: David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>
> Cc: alice wellintown <alicewellintown at gmail.com>; pynchon -l <
> pynchon-l at waste.org>
> Sent: Mon, Sep 9, 2013 10:26 pm
> Subject: Re: The Real Conspiracy
>
>  What cause might that be? I'm lucky enough getting thru each day. Thats
> my cause. Who has the time to be concerned?
>
>
>
> On Sep 9, 2013, at 7:39 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Bad shit is happening now.  How many rat's asses have you given to the
> cause?  Any cause?
>
>  There is never any objective reality to anything anywhere.  Just
> perceptions and interpretations, and hopefully dialogue, shared
> perceptions.  And power writes history, until the next power digs up its
> own history, and buries the old version.  Ad Infinitum. I think this is all
> in V.  I still have my copy.
>
>  Isn't the Internet great!?
>
>  David Morris
>
> On Monday, September 9, 2013, rich wrote:
>
> have any of you read V.? do any of you really give a rats ass about Syria?
> bad shit's gonna happen no matter how well you state your argument
>
> 'He had decided long ago that no Situation had any objective reality'
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:25 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Agreed, Alice.
> That said, in this particular intelligence intercepted panicked
> communication between field and HQ indicates this was not a top-down
> action.  Not Assad's order.
>
>
> On Monday, September 9, 2013, alice wellintown wrote:
>
>
> To remind Israel and others, Turkey, the US, its enemies that, while Syria
> does not have nukes, or a great defense, or great allies in the region,
>  accurate and powerful weapons it can use, against an attack by Israel,
> others, it has chemical weapons and it can, and will use them.
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Bekah <bekah0176 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> I'm curious as to why Assad would use poison gas on children from his own
> country.   I know that Hitler wanted to eliminate Jews and that's been the
> sort of thinking which has gone along with these types of mass atrocities -
> just get rid of the perceived enemy.   So -  does Assad want to eliminate
> his own citizen children?  Are they the children of the rebels?   I've not
> heard anything about the line of Assad's thinking.
>
> One possibility I've come up with is that it's a ploy (possibly factual)
> to get the US involved and stir up a huge anti-American/West sentiment in
> the entire Middle East and elsewhere - possibly reason for attack,  etc.
>  ???
>
> Thoughts?  Why would Assad attack the children? What reason (rational or
> not) could he have?
>
> Bekah
>
>
> On Sep 9, 2013, at 6:12 AM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > http://www.juancole.com/2013/09/strategy-missile-strikes.html
> >
> > Are there any grand strategy considerations behind the Obama
> administration’s desire to bomb Syria? Yes, though they rest on doubtful
> premises.
> > The increasing importance of al-Qaeda-linked radical Sunni
> fundamentalist groups to the civil war in the north of Syria has posed a
> dilemma for the Obama administration, which began calling for the ouster of
> President Bashar al-Assad in late spring of 2011.
> > The US now doesn’t want the regime to fall relatively quickly as in
> Libya, because the al-Qaeda affiliates have become too powerful and could
> well take over Damascus. Highly undesirable. The US does not want that
> outcome, and neither do Israel or Saudi Arabia, the two pillars
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20130910/40366d2b/attachment.html>