Group Read: BLEEDING EDGE: The Cutting Edge

[Keith Davis]

I'm in.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 14, 2013, at 7:59 PM, Markekohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Morris made it happen. He gets the call. Oct 21.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Sep 14, 2013, at 12:22 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I propose Monday, October 21.
>> 
>> On Saturday, September 14, 2013, Joe Allonby wrote:
>>> When do we start?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:29 AM, John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > I for one (two, three easy as Do, Re, Mi) can't wait to see what Alice
>>> > makes of BE. She lived there once, and might guide us down the rabbit
>>> > hole.
>>> >
>>> > SPOILER tag for one month sounds good, though.
>>> >
>>> > And I'm thinking we might need some kind of mega
>>> > YouTube/Spotify/iTunes/steam/whatever linklist. I spent ages sourcing
>>> > a bunch of hard-to-find songs after reading IV, but that now seems
>>> > easy given what's in BE. It's like Inception. You need to go deeper.
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> >> I say YES to SPOILER tag (as I let certain speed readers of Inherent Vice
>>> >> fill up some of my supposed mind)
>>> >>
>>> >> From: Prashant Kumar <siva.prashant.kumar at gmail.com>
>>> >> To: pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org>
>>> >> Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 9:54 AM
>>> >> Subject: Re: Group Read: BLEEDING EDGE: The Cutting Edge
>>> >>
>>> >> Agree with David and the gang above (except possibly Alice (?); what's up
>>> >> dude.): a month to read and let one's own opinions settle before diving into
>>> >> a designated list discussion.
>>> >>
>>> >> And I also want to propose the use of a [SPOILER] tag for threads about BE,
>>> >> for the month following release.
>>> >>
>>> >> P.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On 14 September 2013 22:32, Henry M <scuffling at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm with David and Ian.  Not only have I and we always had the opportunity
>>> >> for individual reads before group ones, but I will be visiting Iceland 21-15
>>> >> October, and will therefor not be available to... spar in Iceland.
>>> >> (Apparently they call it Silverberg in Iceland, I want me a piece!)
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Yours truly,
>>> >> ٩(●̮̮̃•̃)۶
>>> >> Henry Musikar, CISSP
>>> >> http://astore.amazon.com/tdcoccamsaxe-20
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Ian Livingston <igrlivingston at gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Well, fwiw, I agree with David's approach, but due to circumstances, it
>>> >> looks like I'll have to save the discussions either way and read them when I
>>> >> get to read the book.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Markekohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Others?
>>> >>
>>> >> Sent from my iPad
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sep 13, 2013, at 7:00 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I won't join nor read any group read that starts before 10/17, for reasons
>>> >> stated.  A first read should be solo, IMHO.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Friday, September 13, 2013, David Morris wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Two thoughts from me about a BE group read:
>>> >>
>>> >> 1. However many pages or chapters a week are deemed reasonable, I think one
>>> >> group "segment" per week is best.  One "host" per week, covering a specified
>>> >> number of pages, with all others able to supply their own agendas on those
>>> >> pages as well.  More than one "segment" per week will quickly lose the group
>>> >> read altogether.  People have lives, you know?
>>> >>
>>> >> 2. If BE is Pynchon-lite (no endless GR sentences), then 60 pages or so a
>>> >> week might be reasonable.  But if there is real depth in BE, I think slower
>>> >> is better.  I hope BE demands slower...
>>> >>
>>> >> 3.  The group read shouldn't start until at least a month after the official
>>> >> release so the we can read it solo first, without a P-list glancing over the
>>> >> shoulder.
>>> >>
>>> >> David Morris
>>> >>
>>> >> On Friday, September 13, 2013, Mark Kohut wrote:
>>> >>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20130914/5ba238a4/attachment.html>