A WEEK A CHAPTER? WHY THE HELL NOT?

[Markekohut]

Okay.  In between SPAMMING, reading and some other writing today, I started preparing my opening hosting section....Monroe is right on, one can play Pynchon bingo from page 1 and who else ya gonna call? so curmudgeon Morris is still righter than ever, as he holds his ground, I now think, and why not take a week a chapter?....take 10 months to do it, allowing all the density some love into each chapter, all the back-and so-forth, all the time to let it bleed....bloviators like me will love it and so might the succinct who will have the time to distill......

Why not? What else so PYNCHON-rlevant we gonna do???
Lots of space for all the other digressions and spam that sort out the saved from the damned. 

A WEEK A CHAPTER....PUT IT IN YOUR SUBJECT LINE if you agree...



Sent from my iPad

On Sep 22, 2013, at 6:03 PM, Markekohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Dear Curmudgeon,
> 
> But I believe you did offer 6-7 chapters a week---which is the same thing! And we could have taken that on the sign-up sheet. 
> 
> Since when have we stopped commenting on any 'group of pages' post just because we have moved on to later pages? I envisioned plisters reading and commenting when they could but trying to 'catch up' to the posts on a weekend.
> 
> But again, if we all feel Morris has time on his side and want to lengthen the read, let's vote...double the time?....leaving Holiday times free? .....finishing in February then?
> 2 days a chapter? ...3-4 chapters, 30-40 pages a week? Was that our previous pace....
> 
> Can see no other way but to vote again....if we vote yes, we'll just moves the dates on the sign-up  list,okay? 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Sep 22, 2013, at 5:35 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yes.  That's why I signed as "Curmudgeon Morris" in my short rant.
>> 
>> My next comment re. BEER (I repeat):
>> 1 day/1 chapter BEER hosting a bad idea.  It is hosting in TWEET TIME.  This format will almost guarantee lost communication among those not willing or able to daily hang out and interact on an instant basis.  Today's post quickly becomes yesterday's deleted.  This pace is counterproductive.
>> 
>> Just sayin' (again)...
>> 
>> And get your sorry asses off my lawn!
>> 
>> CM
>> 
>> On Sunday, September 22, 2013, Michael Bailey wrote:However, my own take, which for some odd reason i feel moved to record, is it isn't all that hard to delete, or skip over,rilly (: