BE source Michael C. Ruppert dead

[alice malice]

Again, no disrespect to the author or to Thomas, but proof is the
bottom line. And thus far, there is none. Thomas claims P lifts it
from the book word for word, but, unless I missed it, he never
provided the proof. What if P did use the book? So what? What does it
prove, help us understand about BE, the conspiracy stuff?

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Michael Bailey <mikebailey at gmx.us> wrote:
> At any rate, requiescat in pace, as Dave Monroe would say.
>
> His friends are on record as believing it legit (if suicide is ever legit)
>
>
>
> alice malice <alicewmalice at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Here is your beef with me. You have demonstrated nothing here. I called
>> you on it twice. How do you know it was a source?
>> On Wednesday, April 16, 2014, Thomas Eckhardt
>> <thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ruppert's "Crossing the Rubicon" was a source for BE, as I demonstrated a
>>> few weeks ago. The book is on my bedside table (short provisional review: a
>>> whole lot of interesting information that does not amount to building a
>>> convincing case -- there is still too much speculation and innuendo for
>>> that), but I haven't finished it yet.
>>>
>>> Ruppert seems to have committed suicide. Despite my reservations about
>>> the book, I am grateful for his work.
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>> -
>>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>
> - Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l