BEER (possible spoilers) -- PROMIS (by way of conclusion)

[Indel Icate]

Here.

You planetoid retards (not you Eckhart), think, you actually think, that
this globular ball you call Earth is 5 billion years old.  And then, you
effin morons, think that dinasaurs "evolved", then just....poof.  Gone
away.  400 million years of evolution....love....and then the golly really
smart human dickheads "evolved".  What's it been, a whopping 5000 years of
human culture that just popped the fuck out of no where?

Are you complete imbeciles? The universe, 14.6 billion years.  And the only
one!  The diameter of the Moon is 2160 miles.  Exactly the years of one
Zodiacal age.  Of which, we are maneuvering into, another.

If you plant Earths across the Sun, there will be that exact many Suns,
from the Sun, to Earth.  Why is the Moon the exact size of the Sun,
ecliptikkly?  Why is there a sattelite of Saturn that is a perfect sphere,
and it rotates backwards?

Why are humans utterly, completely, hypnotized?

It's because the reptiles never fucking left.  And then, who made them,
never  fucking left either.

Why do humans only use 10% of their brains?

Again, what do the Comma of Pythagoras, and the Giza Plateau, and the Twin
Towers, and 911, have together?





On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Thomas Eckhardt <
thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de> wrote:

> The term "conspiracy theory" as it is currently employed is useless for
> discussing matters like the JFK assassination or 9/11 or, for that matter,
> PROMIS because:
>
> a) It allows to lump together people who believe that we are governed by
> shape-shifting reptilians with people who believe that there are some
> legitimate questions about the JFK assassination or 9/11 that need to be
> answered.
>
> b) It does not account for the fact that the official versions of these
> "deep events" (Peter Dale Scott) are often also conspiracy theories -- if
> they are not lone gunman theories, of course.
>
> c) There are conspiracies (see MK-Ultra, Gladio, Operation Condor,
> Iran-Contra).
>
> The terms we need to use instead, I submit, are "deep politics" or
> "parapolitics". Broadly speaking, these terms refer to the secret services
> (or to "rogue agents" like Theodore Shackley or Edwin Wilson) collaborating
> with right wing terrorists (Gladio), or criminals (the mob, drug
> traffickers, weapons smugglers) in order to fund black operations to
> further political ends.
>
>
> By way of example, as I do not want to always pick on the CIA and the NSA:
>
> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/16/german-neo-
> nazi-security-service-scandal
>
> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/18/how-german-
> neo-nazis-evaded-police
>
> What the Guardian reports is only the tip of an iceberg. Meanwhile, files
> have been destroyed or withheld by the security services, potential
> witnesses have mysteriously committed suicide etc. The theory that this was
> exclusively a conspiracy to murder by three neo-nazis, two of whom are now
> dead under -- you already suspected it, didn't you? -- mysterious
> circumstances, which has been accepted and is supported by much of the
> media, is ridiculous on its face.
>
>
> The beginning of deep politics in the modern era, for all intents and
> purposes, was when the US decided to make a deal with Lucky Luciano in
> order to support the invasion of Italy. Pynchon addresses the episode in BE
> in typical light-hearted manner at the bottom of p. 66.
>
> So, beneath the frantic wisecracking in BE lies the echo chamber, or hall
> of mirrors, of deep politics, where not much can ever be proven but almost
> anything seems possible. The mention of PROMIS provides a glimpse into one
> particular area of deep politics. So do the references to Montauk or to
> time-travelling child-assassins (ignore the bit about time-travelling and
> you have Slothrop and the Manchurian Candidate, i. e. MK-Ultra).
>
> Each one of these references needs to be taken seriously and investigated,
> sources and all.
>
> By the way, what happened to the group read?
>
> Thomas
>
> -
> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20140125/c12fe1f0/attachment.html>