Thomas Pynchon Explained In GIFs Form not Henry Adams again, but Edmund Wilson again

[alice malice]

Someone spotted P at the production of TS play? Right?

Anyway...it still amazes me that strong readers of P can't quite
accept what he says in SL, and continue to focus on his omissions.
He's an American and he writes about his country.

On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 6:00 AM, alice malice <alicewmalice at gmail.com> wrote:
> Intelligentsia
>
> Tom Stoppard on Russia’s renegade thinkers.
>
> by Hilton Als January 8, 2007
> http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/theatre/2007/01/08/070108crth_theatre_als
>
> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:54 AM, alice malice <alicewmalice at gmail.com> wrote:
>> And here, a dine piece of on the road to nowhere and speaking of
>> Utopias and Wilson....
>>
>> On the Road to Nowhere
>>
>>
>> Tom Stoppard’s Russian intellectuals take a wrong turn with Hegel,
>> just as Edmund Wilson once did with Marx
>>
>> By John Patrick Diggins
>>
>> http://theamericanscholar.org/on-the-road-to-nowhere/#.U29ILSiBUTs
>>
>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 9:49 PM, alice malice <alicewmalice at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> In that SL ....To the Finland Staton...
>>>
>>> http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2003/03/24/030324crbo_books1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, May 10, 2014, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is one question: How much of what is " objective scientific inquiry" an
>>>> attempt to control?
>>>>
>>>> I remember Monte giving us an example of ( almost?) pure, loving "science"
>>>> in M & D, I believe, and from naturalists that go way back, thru the
>>>> present, we know this exists in History.
>>>>
>>>> Is the beginning of recording nature, simple catagorizing, the start of
>>>> cataloging and NAMING scientifically, the beginning of domination, power of
>>>> nature, science ambiguously in the service of
>>>> Evil ( as well as good)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>> On May 10, 2014, at 5:06 AM, Kai Frederik Lorentzen <lorentzen at hotmail.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > >> It would be fair to say, though, that Pynchon is obsessed with the
>>>> > >> relationship between reason and authoritarianism, and specifically with how
>>>> > >> the intellectual lineage of fascism—both its roots in the Enlightenment, and
>>>> > >> the way it informs present-day social and political structures—is intimately
>>>> > >> related to the project of objective scientific inquiry.<<
>>>> >
>>>> > This sums it up for me.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 09.05.2014 21:23, Dave Monroe wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/gif-explainers-explained-in-thomas-pynchon-explained-1573696149
>>>> >> -
>>>> >> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>>>> >
>>>> > -
>>>> > Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>>>> -
>>>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?listpynchon-l
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l