Fwd: Gravity's Audio

[Perry Noid]

Yeah I thoroughly enjoyed the master. I'm not sure why it's getting so much
hate but no biggie. Some folks like it some don't.

I'm not too hard to please though, if that means anything. Well I am hard
to please but also not, if that means anything. I'd make a horrible critic.
On Nov 25, 2014 9:58 AM, "Mark Kohut" <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:

> THE MASTER is a still-unrecognized masterpiece, flawed 'only' by it's
> episodic, thematic shorthand structure.
> Bet when the 'full' vision is released, probably after most of us are
> dead.....there will still be folks who don't like it. Always are.
>
> The postwar wounded American male--Phoenix with the Ed Sullivan arms
> pose, with character armor that can't contain him ; the deep "need' to
> follow leaders; Charisma--that postwar disease--and more.
>
> Three, count-em, 3 direct allusions to TRP's work.
>
> The scene where Phoenix is made to walk back-and-forth between the
> walls while all 'play' outside......is almost sublime and will become
> legendary.
>
> But I'm nobody, and few believe me and who are you?
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Keith Davis <kbob42 at gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Gravity's Audio
> To: "kelber at mindspring.com" <kelber at mindspring.com>
> Cc: Mark Thibodeau <jerkyleboeuf at gmail.com>, pynchon -l <
> pynchon-l at waste.org>
>
>
> I think he was referring to BE here, not IV.
>
>
> Www.innergroovemusic.com
>
> > On Nov 25, 2014, at 12:01 PM, <kelber at mindspring.com> <
> kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:
> >
> > Not being belligerent, just curious: which parts of IV are shockingly
> good? And, hey, no one has to agree or disagree. There are no right answers
> here, folks!
> >
> > LK
> > -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Mark Thibodeau <jerkyleboeuf at gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Nov 25, 2014 11:49 AM
> >> To: Laura Kelber <kelber at mindspring.com>
> >> Cc: pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> >> Subject: Re: Gravity's Audio
> >>
> >> I don't understand the hate Bleeding Edge got (okay, the sex scenes
> >> are awful, but still).
> >>
> >> I mean, it's a lot better than Inherent Vice was, and it's some kind
> >> of remarkable when you consider that it was written by a dude in his
> >> 70's. I'd even go so far as to say there are parts of it - long, huge
> >> swaths of it - that are shockingly good.
> >>
> >> Jerky
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:35 AM,  <kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:
> >>> I agree with everything you've said here. Hell, I'd settle for an
> essay or op-ed piece by Pynchon - on Ferguson or anything else he wants to
> write about.
> >>>
> >>> Laura
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>
> >>> From: Carvill John
> >>>
> >>> Sent: Nov 25, 2014 11:23 AM
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, it does seem an appropriately dense and complex analysis. It's
> also pretty good, which ought to serve as a decent corrective for the slew
> of crap -  a stringing of reviews and blog-posts in nets only God can tell
> the meshes of - that's bound to accompany the 'Inherent Vice' movie.
> >>> Personally I don't like Anderson at all, I thought 'The Master' was a
> pile of crap (albeit a very nicely filmed pile of crap), and I can't stand
> Joaquin Phoenix. But still, we live in hope.
> >>> Rather than a worthwhile film based on a Pynchon novel, what I'd
> really like for Christmas would be an actual Pynchon novel, something to
> cleanse the palate after the junk food that was 'Bleeding Edge'...
> >>> -
> >>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
> >> -
> >> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
> >
> > -
> > Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
> -
> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?listpynchon-l
> -
> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?listpynchon-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20141125/1d89601f/attachment.html>