Inherent Vice - Metacritic

[Charles Albert]

My bad....I cut the sentence short...

* .....in which the question of “whodunit?” inevitably leads to an
existential vanishing point. *

Which certainly applies

*.*
Love,
cfa

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:58 PM, rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:

> nothing funny about night moves. unless PTA has ramped up the somber and
> changed inherent vice from what it was (not that that is a bad thing). i
> remain skeptical
>
> rich
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Charles Albert <cfalbert at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> *Anderson’s seventh feature film is a groovy, richly funny stoner romp
>> that has less in common with “The Big Lebowski” than with the strain of
>> fatalistic, ’70s-era California noirs (“Chinatown,” “The Long Goodbye,”
>> “Night Moves”)*
>> So pleased to see the sublime Night Moves getting its well deserved
>> propers...
>>
>> love,
>> cfa
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0688028/fullcredits?ref_=tt_cl_sm#cast
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20141006/e8cea348/attachment.html>