Prepare to search for a Thomas Pynchon cameo in 'Inherent Vice'

[Becky Lindroos]

Perhaps he’ll appear with his back turned - would that count? Could we tell? 

Bek

On Sep 26, 2014, at 8:15 PM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:

> Like. Smiling out Loud. -----
>                                     Fanboy by default. 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Sep 26, 2014, at 9:49 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I gotta admit that the prospect of a Pynchon cameo excites me like a fanboy.  I hate fanboys.
>> 
>> David Morris
>> 
>> On Friday, September 26, 2014, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>> MY belief is that this is UNBELIEVEABLE ( in both senses, but not at once, if you think about it) publicity for the movie.
>> I bet he will not be visible in any scene....even if his picture is taken by Anderson's cameramen, because he was an extra in some scene, he will end up on the cutting room floor.
>> 
>> But I hope I am wrong. My working speculation is: he will not reveal himself as Thomas Pynchon in a photograph or picture. But, I may be wrong in another way if he does appear: he is NOT Thomas Pynchon as an extra in a movie. 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> On Sep 26, 2014, at 12:06 PM, Henry M <scuffling at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> NFW! http://www.imdb.com/news/ni57789010/ 
>>> 
>>> Yours truly,
>>> ٩(●̮̮̃•̃)۶
>>> Henry Musikar, CISSP
>>> http://astore.amazon.com/tdcoccamsaxe-20

-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l