Inherent Vice trailer

Perry Noid coolwithdoc at gmail.com
Tue Sep 30 10:52:39 CDT 2014


If I was Johnny Greenwood reading IV knowing I'd be doing music for the
film I probably wouldn't be able to help myself. Then again, sometimes
these things just don't work. I wouldn't doubt that he at least thought of
it. I remember googling 'Soul Gidget' after reading the book to see if
anyone had made one. Anyhooz, I second that emotion, I wanna hear it in the
movie.
On Sep 30, 2014 8:41 AM, <kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:

> I was a little lukewarm on the book, but the trailer looks great. Can't
> wait to see it! In terms of the music, I know my hopes will be dashed, but
> wouldn't it be great to see a rendering of Soul Gidget?
>
> Laura
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com>
> >Sent: Sep 30, 2014 9:04 AM
> >To: David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>
> >Cc: Perry Noid <coolwithdoc at gmail.com>, Pynchon List <pynchon-l at waste.org
> >
> >Subject: Re: Inherent Vice trailer
> >
> >Definitely joshin', David.
> >
> >The trailer could be read as a spoof of Coen Brothers comedies,
> >including The Big Lebowski, and other 90s-Gen directors Anderson grew
> >up with and has supplanted. The music and editing is Tarantino, not
> >Pynchon (that trailer would be more Elephant's Memory and Fapardokly
> >and Yummy Yummy Yummy ugh my tummy). The last few sequences also
> >remind me of the ending of PTA's Hard Eight, possibly given the
> >knock-out treatment here.
> >
> >The key image, though, is of the kneeling Doc holding his
> >nether-regions safe as a fleet of policemen pass by. That's the
> >Pynchon this damn flick should aim for. I have great hopes.
> >
> >On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:53 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Looks good to me, music and all.  How Bailey presumes DEFINITELY
> anything
> >> about this film is funny.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:46 PM, John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think it's been edited to make it seem like the kind of movie it's
> >>> not. Eg there's not a single hint of weed shown, or anything not
> >>> G-rated really. And some of the music choices are DEFINITELY not from
> >>> the film itself.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Perry Noid <coolwithdoc at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Gah! Do I watch or no? I know I'm gonna see it, don't need it to
> >>> > convince
> >>> > me, but...oh this is painful.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:31 PM, John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Did I miss this posting?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUZgOQ186-A
> >>> >> -
> >>> >> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> -
> >>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
> >>
> >>
> >-
> >Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20140930/150f61e1/attachment.html>


More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list