in Which V. is mentioned. as original.

[Mark Kohut]

keep going in that direction. (Unless you want the completist-so-far
feeling of all the short stories. )

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Vitor Repinaldo
<vitor_repinaldo at hotmail.com> wrote:
> I'm finishing V and i've already read Lot49, what should i pick next?
>
> ________________________________
> Subject: Re: in Which V. is mentioned. as original.
> From: kbob42 at gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:00:29 -0500
> CC: richard.romeo at gmail.com; pynchon-l at waste.org; mark.kohut at gmail.com
> To: jerkyleboeuf at gmail.com
>
>
> Vineland!
>
> Www.innergroovemusic.com
>
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Mark Thibodeau <jerkyleboeuf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Vineland Vineland Uber Alles!
>
> On Dec 3, 2015 10:02 AM, "rich" <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> all i would claim is that GR belongs to the creative thrust that began with
> V. and ended with M&D. there are some bits in AtD worthy but the rest imho
> is fairly disposable
>
> rich
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> but no matter what one thinks of some of the later books,
> Gravity's Rainbow HAS TO BE SEEN as, among much newness,
> V. perfected, no?
>
> Gravity's Rainbow is V. squared.
>
> and, didn't Pynchon avoid Parks' basic criticism by writing
> SO MANY DIFFERENT new books....
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:34 AM, rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> w/r/t to Pynchon I think there's some merit to that criticism
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> self-derivative, repetitive,
>>> in some way inferior to the first bursts of the writer's vision.
>>>
>>
>
>
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l