in Which V. is mentioned. as original.

[Keith Davis]

It's a crime to read GR, or it's a crime to re-issue, or something else?

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Vitor Repinaldo <vitor_repinaldo at hotmail.com
> wrote:

> I can´t find GR anywhere in my country (no longer reissued - it's a crime)
> and I don't know if i coud read in another language. So Vineland or M&D?
>
> > Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:51:11 -0500
> > Subject: Re: in Which V. is mentioned. as original.
> > From: mark.kohut at gmail.com
> > To: vitor_repinaldo at hotmail.com
> > CC: kbob42 at gmail.com; jerkyleboeuf at gmail.com; richard.romeo at gmail.com;
> pynchon-l at waste.org
>
> >
> > keep going in that direction. (Unless you want the completist-so-far
> > feeling of all the short stories. )
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Vitor Repinaldo
> > <vitor_repinaldo at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > I'm finishing V and i've already read Lot49, what should i pick next?
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > Subject: Re: in Which V. is mentioned. as original.
> > > From: kbob42 at gmail.com
> > > Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:00:29 -0500
> > > CC: richard.romeo at gmail.com; pynchon-l at waste.org; mark.kohut at gmail.com
> > > To: jerkyleboeuf at gmail.com
> > >
> > >
> > > Vineland!
> > >
> > > Www.innergroovemusic.com
> > >
> > > On Dec 3, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Mark Thibodeau <jerkyleboeuf at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Vineland Vineland Uber Alles!
> > >
> > > On Dec 3, 2015 10:02 AM, "rich" <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > all i would claim is that GR belongs to the creative thrust that began
> with
> > > V. and ended with M&D. there are some bits in AtD worthy but the rest
> imho
> > > is fairly disposable
> > >
> > > rich
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > but no matter what one thinks of some of the later books,
> > > Gravity's Rainbow HAS TO BE SEEN as, among much newness,
> > > V. perfected, no?
> > >
> > > Gravity's Rainbow is V. squared.
> > >
> > > and, didn't Pynchon avoid Parks' basic criticism by writing
> > > SO MANY DIFFERENT new books....
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:34 AM, rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> w/r/t to Pynchon I think there's some merit to that criticism
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> self-derivative, repetitive,
> > >>> in some way inferior to the first bursts of the writer's vision.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > -
> > Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>



-- 
www.innergroovemusic.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20151203/f2c878c2/attachment.html>