in Which V. is mentioned. as original.

[David Morris]

Gravity's Rainbow is his masterpiece.  And I mostly agree with Mark that it
is a maturation of V's message, voice, and structure.

David Morris

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Vitor Repinaldo <
vitor_repinaldo at hotmail.com> wrote:

> I'm finishing V and i've already read Lot49, what should i pick next?
>
> ------------------------------
> Subject: Re: in Which V. is mentioned. as original.
> From: kbob42 at gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:00:29 -0500
> CC: richard.romeo at gmail.com; pynchon-l at waste.org; mark.kohut at gmail.com
> To: jerkyleboeuf at gmail.com
>
>
> Vineland!
>
> Www.innergroovemusic.com <http://www.innergroovemusic.com>
>
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Mark Thibodeau <jerkyleboeuf at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Vineland Vineland Uber Alles!
> On Dec 3, 2015 10:02 AM, "rich" <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> all i would claim is that GR belongs to the creative thrust that began
> with V. and ended with M&D. there are some bits in AtD worthy but the rest
> imho is fairly disposable
>
> rich
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> but no matter what one thinks of some of the later books,
> Gravity's Rainbow HAS TO BE SEEN as, among much newness,
> V. perfected, no?
>
> Gravity's Rainbow is V. squared.
>
> and, didn't Pynchon avoid Parks' basic criticism by writing
> SO MANY DIFFERENT new books....
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:34 AM, rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> > w/r/t to Pynchon I think there's some merit to that criticism
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> self-derivative, repetitive,
> >> in some way inferior to the first bursts of the writer's vision.
> >>
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20151203/56c110f3/attachment.html>