what's in a word?

Mark Kohut mark.kohut at gmail.com
Fri Dec 4 13:26:47 CST 2015


yes, I fell back on my first 'studies'....Nechaev....and Laquer's
definition a bit later.
You are right, and I remember reading it in what you sent, about REIGN
OF TERROR.

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Danny Weltman <danny.weltman at gmail.com> wrote:
> If "traditional" actually means "original," the "traditional" meaning of the
> term is the intimidation undertaken by the government during the Reign of
> Terror in the French Revolution. If by "traditional" we just mean "what it
> has meant up until recently," then the "traditional" meaning has changed
> over time, as is the case with most politically charged words (and with a
> good chunk of less politically charged words, too). A good summary can be
> found in section 1 of this article:
> http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/terrorism/
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I always thought the core 'traditional' meaning of the word was to
>> kill/attack citizens when not at war.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Paul Mackin <mackin.paul at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > This is the traditional meaning of the word, I always thought.
>> >
>> > Non-terrorist gun killing may be the greater threat in one sense, but a
>> > lesser one in another.  Fear can change people in bad ways, but THAT
>> > ship
>> > has sailed.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:44 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> So, by this logic, the motive of the killer determines whether the
>> >> violence is an act of terrorism.  Only if the intent is to instill a
>> >> sense
>> >> of danger/terror in the surviving populace would the act be properly
>> >> called
>> >> terroeism.
>> >>
>> >> David Morris
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Paul Mackin <mackin.paul at gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> "
>> >>> As one friend pointed out, Paris is not actually any more dangerous
>> >>> than
>> >>> before Nov. 13. What's changed, dramatically, is our perception of
>> >>> imminent
>> >>> danger. And that makes all the psychological difference."
>> >>>
>> >>> And that's what makes it TERRORISM.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/12/03/does-motive-matter-in-mass-shootings-like-the-one-in-san-bernadino/even-in-paris-guns-look-like-a-greater-threat-than-terrorism
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> -
>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>
>
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l



More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list