Purely out of curiosity...

[ish mailian]

Was the clock a school project? In other words, did a teacher, a club
adviser, any adult in the school assign a project, and did the clock fit
the assignment? Or did the young man make a clock and bring it to school?

As far as I can tell the young man did not build a clock or make a project,
or in any way bring something to school that was part of an assignment from
any adult in the building. It was not a project. It was not show and tell.
It seems the student took apart a clock, re-fashioned it and put in in a
box and brought it to school.

Why did he do this? What was his motivation?

Whatever his intentions, if he re-assembled clock parts in a box and took
them to school, he broke the law. While 14 year old boys, and sometimes 14
year old girls, are instructed that bringing a clock in a box, a plastic
gun, a plastic sword, a paper bomb or dynamite  etc..., even on Halloween
is dangerous and against the law, young people do make these kinds of
mistakes, from time to time. Best if they make them in school as school is
the safest place in the world for students. Obviously, doing so in the
street may get one killed by a police officer or even a gun toting citizen.
In a school the child, age 14, will be interrogated, handcuffed, probably,
and asked to write a statement explaining his or her intentions and the
police will contact the guardians and book the kid. This is the law. It
matters not the race or religion of the child.

>From time to time, a  brave administrator, more likely an experienced
teacher will protect the child with a slap on the wrist, but the current
mood in the country and in schools is making this a rare act of....welll
not courage, but decency.



On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:02 AM, The Jonathon Hunt Experience <
newtalkingwall at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is there any evidence that the kid "only" took apart a store bought clock
> and put it back together, beyond people online pointing out that doing so
> is a thing that people can do? Beyond that, if the child acted as
> maliciously as Richard Dawkins and others would like to believe, this means
> his whole plan hinged on the knowledge that his teachers and police would
> confuse a circuit board and some wires with something that can explode. If
> our teachers and police are this stupid (which seems to be the case, here),
> then we are lucky in getting off with a $15 million dollar fine.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20151211/33470d54/attachment.html>