Men Explain Lolita To Me
Charles Albert
cfalbert at gmail.com
Fri Dec 18 11:33:01 CST 2015
In it's short form, I don't think the response ranges far beyond
frustration and/or indignation. Which, I suspect, motivated the piece in
the first place.
love,
cfa
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Danny Weltman <danny.weltman at gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'm not sure it's fair to call something "long exhausted" if it's able to
> generate voluminous discussion, as this piece most certainly can.
>
> Danny
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Charles Albert <cfalbert at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thesis?
>>
>> Or long exhausted trope?
>>
>>
>> love,
>> cfa
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Typical of Solnit: witty,engaging, sharp but balanced, and a pleasure to
>>> read. Many of the responses seem to prove her thesis with unexpected ease.
>>> > On Dec 17, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Matthew Taylor <
>>> matthew.taylor923 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Thoughts on Rebecca Solnit's latest?
>>> >
>>> > http://lithub.com/men-explain-lolita-to-me/
>>>
>>> -
>>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?listpynchon-l
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20151218/b05063d2/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list