Thesis: that Pynchon is not a " political" writer at all.

[Steven Koteff]

I think it probably also has a different idea of the border between the animate and the inanimate world than could come from anyone rightfully called a political writer. 

> On Dec 26, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Paul Mackin <mackin.paul at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The us/them business implies class warfare, but resistance doesn't seem that promising.  Sympathy for the animate and inanimate world is what GR offers.  Maybe reverence too.
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Paul Mackin <mackin.paul at gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's a bad rap.  I'm with Stephen Dedalus.
>> 
>> Good article, Mark. Thanks.
>> 
>> We do need political writers (hacks preferred) to convince the Red States that they're putting in office people whose allegiance is elsewhere.
>> 
>>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If this guy and Auden are right. And Orwell, a fave of our author.
>>> 
>>> It's all been mistaken readings. If claimed.
>>> 
>>> >
>>> > http://bostonreview.net/poetry/robert-huddleston-wh-auden-struggle-politics?utm_content=24965190&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
>>> -
>>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?listpynchon-l
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20151226/9fb4fa89/attachment.html>