M&D Chapter 12 - pages 118-119
Mark Kohut
mark.kohut at gmail.com
Sat Feb 28 11:35:51 CST 2015
Or Middlemarch is still a GREAT novel because it was a great novel.
Then link to Borges story of the man who rewrote Don Quixote. Now a
derivate hack job (so to speak)
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
> I might say: Round about Sometime (shortly after 1910, Woolf's Year of
> Human Nature change), reality changed. Again.
>
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Monte Davis <montedavis49 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Becky, your reference tent me back to re-read for the fifth or sixth time
>> Wood's 2001 "Human, All Too Inhuman" (the "hysterical realism" review of
>> Zadie Smith's White Teeth). I'm finally getting a handle on what has
>> bothered me about it all along. A sample follows, although I commend the
>> entire piece to anyone who hasn't read it (or re-read it lately in the
>> context of M&D)
>> http://www.newrepublic.com/article/61361/human-all-too-inhuman
>>
>> --
>> "A genre is hardening...
>>
>> The big contemporary novel is a perpetual-motion machine that appears to
>> have been embarrassed into velocity. It seems to want to abolish stillness,
>> as if ashamed of silence--as it were, a criminal running endless charity
>> marathons. Stories and sub-stories sprout on every page, as these novels
>> continually flourish their glamorous congestion. Inseparable from this
>> culture of permanent storytelling is the pursuit of vitality at all costs.
>> Indeed, vitality is storytelling, as far as these books are concerned...
>>
>> ...Recent novels--veritable relics of St. Vitus--by Rushdie, Pynchon, DeLillo,
>> Foster Wallace, and others, have featured a great rock musician who, when
>> born, began immediately to play air guitar in his crib (Rushdie); a talking
>> dog, a mechanical duck, a giant octagonal cheese, and two clocks having a
>> conversation (Pynchon); a nun called Sister Edgar who is obsessed with germs
>> and who may be a reincarnation of J. Edgar Hoover, and a conceptual artist
>> painting retired B-52 bombers in the New Mexico desert (DeLillo); a
>> terrorist group devoted to the liberation of Quebec called the Wheelchair
>> Assassins, and a film so compelling that anyone who sees it dies (Foster
>> Wallace). Zadie Smith's novel features, among other things: a terrorist
>> Islamic group based in North London with a silly acronym (kevin), an
>> animal-rights group called fate, a Jewish scientist who is genetically
>> engineering a mouse, a woman born during an earthquake in Kingston, Jamaica,
>> in 1907; a group of Jehovah's Witnesses who think that the world is ending
>> on December 31, 1992; and twins, one in Bangladesh and one in London, who
>> both break their noses at about the same time.
>>
>> This is not magical realism. It is hysterical realism. Storytelling has
>> become a kind of grammar in these novels; it is how they structure and drive
>> themselves on. The conventions of realism are not being abolished but, on
>> the contrary, exhausted, and overworked. Appropriately, then, objections are
>> not made at the level of verisimilitude, but at the level of morality: this
>> style of writing is not to be faulted because it lacks reality--the usual
>> charge against botched realism--but because it seems evasive of reality while
>> borrowing from realism itself. It is not a cock-up, but a cover-up..."
>>
>> --
>>
>> I respect and admire Wood greatly as one of the best critics of our time
>> (even at book-review depth, or rather enforced shallowness). I think he's
>> entirely right in tracing much of the fiction he's talking about, directly
>> or indirectly, to Dickens: he quotes E.M. Forster on Dickens' "caricatures"
>> from the "flat and round characters" passage in Aspects of the Novel, which
>> also comes up often here on the P-list:
>>
>> https://catalyst.uw.edu/workspace/file/download/b3babc90fd75d98bc0147d086ad3068f6aeced8b2f8b089e9d5a4036700810c5.
>>
>> What I noticed much more this time around was Woods'strongly (but usually
>> implied, tacit) *normative* stance. Literary realism of the non-hysterical
>> kind is not simply credited but *identified* with engaging reality... with
>> the capability of expressing tragedy or anguish... with real human
>> experience, real human connection... with life, with depth... in short, with
>> almost every Good Thing one could want from narrative art. Well, jeez... who
>> wouldn't want all those those?
>>
>> But, jeez... do I really believe that the realist novel -- more
>> specifically, novels broadly descended from the 19th-century English core
>> (Austen, Eliot, James, Conrad) identified as "The Great Tradition" by F. R.
>> Leavis -- is now and forever the only, or the best, way to get them? Nope.
>> The label "realism" has always been a lousy one, quietly implying vast
>> philosophical claims. Writers were getting at trad=gedy, connection, depth
>> and All That (and at other aspects of experience that character- and
>> relationship- and individual-consciousness-centered realist novels *don't*
>> get at very well) long before realism developed, and have been doing so
>> right through the realist reign. They aren't "exhausting" or "overworking"
>> or "evading" anything -- they're doing something else. And often enough, in
>> ways that matter to me, something more.
>>
>> --
>>
>> PS - Encountered along the way, an article on the novel that reminds us of
>> its, uh, parochial origins and probable transience:
>>
>>
>> http://www.booksandculture.com/articles/2015/marapr/novel-as-protestant-art.html
>>
>> If you can't keep all those murderous Near Eastern sects straight and prefer
>> to Weberize the title as "The Novel as Post- Enlightenment Fast-Urbanizing
>> Individualist Commercial/Industrial/Capitalist Art", that works too.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Becky Lindroos <bekker2 at icloud.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Another day, another couple pages:
>>>
>>> Maskalyne likens St. Helena to a gothic novel and says
>>>
>>> "Six months I've been here - too many idle Minutes soon pile up, topple
>>> and overwhelm the Healthiest Mind."
>>>
>>> (A little foreshadowing there? - Suspicions that Mason might go
>>> completely mad? Pynchon doesn't really go in for a lot of foreshadowing to
>>> keep up suspense or whatever - just as well, it would take the whole thing
>>> overboard, overdone, too much.)
>>>
>>> ** "Sirius Business," cackles the Proprietor. - another groaner gag.
>>>
>>> This novel has some very serious themes, but told with a LOT of humor -
>>> not just humor to lighten the atmosphere -there's actually a comic tone.
>>>
>>> "But I also noticed that the book's (M&D's) humor was more thoroughly
>>> interwoven with melancholy and a sense of mortality than ever before in
>>> Pynchon's work."
>>> http://www.swarthmore.edu/Humanities/pschmid1/essays/pynchon/mason.html
>>>
>>> "Mason & Dixon represents an impulse to write history through the
>>> imaginary field, to crosshatch its narrative with a realization of culture's
>>> desire to find its identity in the realm of the imagination. It thus argues,
>>> implicitly, for the importance of artistic imagination alongside scientific
>>> and historical work. Pynchon rejects the harsh realism and more cynical
>>> parodies employed by many contemporary authors, using HUMOR (my caps) and
>>> even magic as modes of transformation.[17] Talking dogs, sexually aroused
>>> mechanical ducks, and nighttime apparitions and ghosts haunt Mason and Dixon
>>> in America; perhaps the country that combines technical invention with
>>> capitalistic enterprise might be equallymythologic in Pynchon's ambivalent
>>> history."
>>> http://pmc.iath.virginia.edu/issue.903/14.1burns.html
>>>
>>> Thoughts on the humor and how it adds to the mix of history, themes,
>>> story, whatever - do you laugh? Why?
>>>
>>> **********
>>> And then, ta-da - it's Maskelyne's birthday - (which would tell us it's
>>> October 6, 1761 and that he's 29 years old - born Oct. 1732) and he makes a
>>> big deal of impending doom (age 30 is coming).
>>>
>>> The phrase "Stygian mists" is from "To Chloris" in "Madrigals and
>>> Epigrams" by William Drummond of Hawthornden (1585-1649) Scottish poet. a
>>> little chunk of the poem - http://www.bartleby.com/337/285.html
>>>
>>> Mason: (but 30 is) "... a Number divisible,- penetrable! - by 6 numbers!"
>>> (eeks? why? - numerology of some kind I guess.)
>>>
>>> *** Narrator: "...dismal apostrophes..." -
>>> And in this case the word apostrophe means exclamations, not the
>>> punctuation symbol.
>>>
>>> **** Now Dixon is leaving for South Africa to take care of Maskelyne's
>>> "Sisson instrument" which is probably a quadrant of some sort, a device
>>> for measuring angles.
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Sisson
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodolite
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrant_(instrument)
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mural_instrument
>>>
>>> If the measurement device is off by a hair - then that slight
>>> error is multiplied exponentially and Maskelyne has invested more than time
>>> and his career in the instrument ($$?) . Dixon is the field rep for Johnny
>>> Bird's instruments? - lol - but ...
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bird_(astronomer)
>>>
>>> Why are the various measurements of time and space inaccurate? Errors in
>>> measurement - 1. human error - the time of the Transit (because M&D
>>> started/ stopped at different places) and, 2. device error (plumb line
>>> screwed up on quadrant).
>>> **********
>>> Is there really so little on these two pages? Or is this "so little?"
>>>
>>> So here's an added little morsel for the Learn'd Dogs amongst us - James
>>> Wood, in a now "classic" essay soundly criticized Zadie Smith's White Teeth
>>> for it's "hysterical realism" and lambasted a few others in the process
>>> (M&D, etc).
>>> http://www.newrepublic.com/article/61361/human-all-too-inhuman
>>>
>>> And this is a rather interesting little Wiki article on the subject:
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hysterical_realism
>>> (interesting little piece)
>>>
>>> Becky
>>> the humor bit reminded me of hysterical and that took me on the little
>>> semi-side trip to Wood and Wiki -
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?listpynchon-l
>>
>>
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list