The Paradox of Encyclopedic Fiction

[Mark Kohut]

This article puts me in mind of Morris's theme: such a
label, encyclopedic fiction is just an empty label...
a word that means BIG, FULL OF SHIT..

I think this article then analyses distinctions he finds
as if they matter logically. What matters is the fiction,
if it matters.

(to fault GR with that FALSE semen and invisible ink
bit, thought to be a pure Pynchon invention and now
learned (by us) to sometimes be true BUT NOT AS
PYNCHON wrote it seems like a 'confusion of categories'
as some logicians say.

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.academia.edu/6045215/The_Paradox_of_Encyclopedic_Fiction
> -
> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l