Another Greif review

[Mark Kohut]

We've been here before. Maybe you are right. 
But I think ' values' in BLEEDING EDGE say, are as ambiguously poised as in GR, say. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 15, 2015, at 12:10 PM, rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think that's generally true but in his recent offerings the ambiguity pro-offered is less ambiguous
> 
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>> or, since one of his 'values' seems to be anti-Either-Orness, one
>> might reject the dichotomy in the choice as so presented and  embrace
>> the poised ambiguities of meanings.
>> As a value.
>> 
>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Monte Davis <montedavis49 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > "It becomes impossible to declare Pynchon's ultimate 'values' without
>> > exposing yourself to the embarrassing admission that you may just want
>> > Pynchon to share your values, and thus settle for one or another of his
>> > alternatives on that basis." (Mark Greif)
>> >
>> > http://www.publicbooks.org/nonfiction/the-trouble-with-modernity
>> >
>> -
>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20150515/9466bef6/attachment.html>