Movie: Inherent Vice

[John Bailey]

The movie is a neater, more streamlined version of the book. Made
total sense to me, ie there were no loose ends or cryptic signifiers
that left me scratching my head. Seriously don't get the reviewers who
said 'not getting it is the point!'

Then again, all of this kind of makes it *less* Pynchonian, but still
kinda more enjoyable than the book itself imho.

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com> wrote:
> http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/inherent-vice-from-page-to-screen-the-6-biggest-changes-from-the-book-20141215
>
> http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/12/19/inherent_vice_book_vs_movie_how_pynchon_s_novel_paul_thomas_anderson_s_movie.html
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 4:49 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I just now saw IV movie on DVD.  I liked it a lot. Might the movie be better
>> than the book?  Is there a source that judges how close the movie and book
>> compare? Still, it felt a lot like Pynchon to me.
>>
>> David Morris
>>
> -
> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l