Movie: Inherent Vice

[Mark Kohut]

So, why and what meaning the Golden Fang? 

Wolfson, why, what? 

Sent from my iPad

> On May 25, 2015, at 6:01 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes. The "makes sense" aspect does make it *less* Pynchonian. But that's OK.
> 
>> On Monday, May 25, 2015, John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The movie is a neater, more streamlined version of the book. Made
>> total sense to me, ie there were no loose ends or cryptic signifiers
>> that left me scratching my head. Seriously don't get the reviewers who
>> said 'not getting it is the point!'
>> 
>> Then again, all of this kind of makes it *less* Pynchonian, but still
>> kinda more enjoyable than the book itself imho.
>> 
>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/inherent-vice-from-page-to-screen-the-6-biggest-changes-from-the-book-20141215
>> >
>> > http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/12/19/inherent_vice_book_vs_movie_how_pynchon_s_novel_paul_thomas_anderson_s_movie.html
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 4:49 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I just now saw IV movie on DVD.  I liked it a lot. Might the movie be better
>> >> than the book?  Is there a source that judges how close the movie and book
>> >> compare? Still, it felt a lot like Pynchon to me.
>> >>
>> >> David Morris
>> >>
>> > -
>> > Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20150525/ef550fb1/attachment.html>