NP - St. Ralph Continues To Advance the Most Important Cause in American Politics, His Ego

[ish mailian]

With the cheap money the rich are buying up properties and raising rents on
the working class, the poor and retired. And, low rates and the liquidity
that spills into the pools of the wealthy causes instability, as hot liquid
money moves effortlessly from market to market to fatten the pigs. The end
of the carry trade will stifle some of this hot money destabilization.

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:46 PM, ish mailian <ishmailian at gmail.com> wrote:

> And...an aging demographic argues the case too, that higher rates will
> support the retired and retiring. Also, the current super low rates are not
> available to most working class and poor and retired people. The super low
> rates are benefiting only those who can get cheap loans.
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:38 PM, ish mailian <ishmailian at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't know much about RN's relationships with female academics or their
>> husbands but he may still claim to be supporting both a rate hike by the
>> Fed and working people, the poor, and the retired, most of whom are not
>> rich but nevertheless, live on investments, the great portion of which is
>> in fixed income securities.
>>
>> One need only give Nader the benefit of the broken Phillip's Curve. There
>> are a growing number of economists who now contend that the continuance of
>> the zero bound policy is hurting the economy and working people because,
>> while unemployment has been driven down to near NAIRU by Fed policy, it
>> will nothing to lift wages and will cost, not only those retired to live on
>> less, but those close to retirement to work longer because investment in
>> safe retirement assets is discouraged while bubbles are made an popped,
>> and, while those indebted must pay off loans with non-inflated wages.
>>
>> The Fed has a triple mandate, though the press and the Fed and Congress
>> confuse things by calling it a duel mandate. The third part is rates. The
>> Fed is charged with keeping rates in a range that promotes growth. It's no
>> doing that now. It is fixated on the Phillips curve model and it's not
>> working now. JY did well to focus on the unemployed and the participation
>> rate and the quit rate etc..., in other words, employment and wages, and
>> ignore inflation. She should continue with that plan. The Fed can't fight
>> the world. At this point, RN is on to something....lift rates to help the
>> working people.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:18 AM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ralph Nader, epic mansplainer, tells Janet Yellen to listen to her
>>> husband.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.salon.com/2015/11/02/ralph_nader_epic_mansplainer_tells_janet_yellen_to_listen_to_her_husband/
>>>
>>> Apparently, Ralph Nader is still talking, though in a way that certainly
>>> inspires a deep desire to go to Tumblr to find as many “shut up” gifs as
>>> one can find. Over the weekend, Nader published a nonsensical piece at the
>>> Huffington Post complaining that “humble savers” are getting screwed by the
>>> Federal Reserve’s unwillingness to raise the interest rate, which Nader
>>> seems to think is an elaborate plot to help the rich banks at the expense
>>> of working people.
>>>
>>> As Jordan Weissmann at Slate points out, the entire argument doesn’t
>>> make a lot of sense, as “relatively few households actually survive on
>>> interest income.” Most ordinary people would benefit a lot more from a
>>> robust economy than a higher interest rate on their savings account, but
>>> Nader seems to assume a nation of people living on investments rather than
>>> on paychecks, which really undermines his spokesman-for-the-working-class
>>> schtick.
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20151103/94ade8ce/attachment.html>