Comic relief but I got nothin' either

Mark Kohut mark.kohut at gmail.com
Wed Nov 18 11:43:20 CST 2015


Yes, I see what you say too. .......probb Krugman and Milbank cannot
go there in those papers....How do we
VERIFIABLY see such qualities for major newspapers?  .......Debaters
would torch their reputations......
which is why Hunter Thompson is still the best......

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Monte Davis <montedavis49 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, when I rambled in the Krugman thread I had the latest GOP
> candidates' debate in mind. I heard something more than the rote
> "leadership" and "strength" and "boots on the ground will work better this
> time" that Milbank observes... more than the bipartisan "indispensable
> nation, something must be done and this is something so we must do it."
>
> I heard a just-barely-subterranean thread of welcoming more Parises and
> Benghazis -- or at least "see, we were right"... of wanting Daesh, Iran et
> al to be as bad as they can be, of *wanting* Manichaean, apocalyptic
> confrontations. Maybe some of it is an attenuated version of the
> bring-on-Armageddon stance of some End Timers among their base.
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Paul Mackin <mackin.paul at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/dana-milbank
>> -
>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>
>
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l



More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list