Murakami: Blind Willow, Sleeping Woman - Invitation to view

[Mark Kohut]

              " the old questions, the old answers. Nothing like them"---Beckett

Fate, fGreek sense--classics major he was--up against Existentialism are the wells ( allusion intended) from which he uses metaphysics. deep enough? Beyond my judgment yet.

So, David, nothing Jungian about his archetypes? Genuinely asking, no real idea.  

Sent from my iPad

> On Oct 9, 2015, at 7:01 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> My main problem is the tangential throwaway metaphysics. They are either silly and shallow or lead nowhere.  I've wondered if maybe it's due to my lack of Japanese cultural background.  If so, his archetypes are extremely parochial.  And the stories without them aren't compelling.
> 
> David
> 
>> On Friday, October 9, 2015, David Kilroy <thesaintgodard at gmail.com> wrote:
>> My main argument against the Chronicle is the cast.  I find them all very difficult to engage with, unlike most other Murakmi I've read.  I realize this is more to do with the culture, set & setting, than anything else.  I exist in a culture actively estranging itself so a story about coming to terms with alienation has to have some emotional texture, some rock in the stream with an irregular surface for me to cling to.
>> 
>> Contrariwise, my favorite character in WUBC-- that is, the most clearly embedded in my memory --is Noboru Wataya.  It's his cipherlike nature as an antagonist.  He's a cloudy diamond, of the same water as Brock Vond or Windust.  Could be I'm just a sucker for ambivalent villainy.  Could be that's why I haven't absquatulated from Amerika already...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20151010/a226d6fc/attachment.html>