NP - W von Braun on Nazi Hunter doc
Thomas Eckhardt
thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de
Thu Oct 22 09:33:19 CDT 2015
> From our GR angle, the cover-up -- to the extent there was one -- was
> to encourage the idea that there had been a de facto "firewall" between
> Peenemunde (all engineers and scientists and technicians who sent their
> designs and revisions "somewhere")... and Mittelwerk-Dora, built and run
> by Kammler's SS.
This makes sense. Paperclip elect Georg Rickhey was the one
civilian/engineer who stood trial and was acquitted because his guilt
could not be proved -- not surprisingly, if it is true that "[h]is
Paperclip job at the air base was analagous to putting a fox in a
chicken coop. Rickhey was paid to translate forty-two boxes of
Mittelwerk documents shipped from Nordhausen--the very same
records a U.S. Army war crimes unit sought to use as evidence of his
crimes."
So, what do you make of Hunt's assertion:
"Then, in an unprecedented move, the Army classified the entire trial
record. The American public would not know that Rudolph, Magnus von
Braun, and others at Fort Bliss had worked at Mittelwerk,
not Peenemunde. The press would not be able to obtain Smith's report
that noted his suspicions about Rudolph, or see trial testimony of
witnesses who said it was Rudolph who had signed sabotage
reports that were turned over to the SS. Wernher von Braun would be
saved from having to answer awkward questions about his frequent visits
to that underground hell. No one would know about twenty thousand men
who died while working as slaves on Hitler's V-2. No one would even know
that Camp Dora existed.
All of that evidence was now safely hidden from public scrutiny. And it
stayed that way for decades."
Simply not true? Hyperbole?
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list