BtZ42, 21: Slothrop backstory in UK

[Mark Kohut]

Yeahp, now seems righter (sic). Thanks.

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:29 PM, <kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:

> I read "Atlantics" as, aside from the current desk (or is it a pub
> table?), cultural differences between Brits and Yanks.
>
> LK
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Kohut
> Sent: Apr 6, 2016 3:08 PM
> To: Monte Davis , pynchon -l
> Subject: Re: BtZ42, 21: Slothrop backstory in UK
>
> Weisenburger says Part one of GR begins on  Dec 18, 1944. [*Companion,* Introduction,
> p10 ] Which means three years before would be right after Pearl Harbor---if
> he meant exactly 3 years and did not round up 2 years 10 or 11 months--or
> round down from 3 years a month or two for that matter,  as we often do
> when we comment on knowing someone, esp as "lots of stuff..is getting
> blurry" .
>
> An early Pynchon reader, explainer, Thomas Slade, sez Slothrop was in
> London for a year. I read that book back in the day----published as a mass
> market paperback, ladies & gentlemen, amazing but true--but lots of stuff
> in it is really blurry now and I think I must have internalized that time
> period, whether Slade is right or wrong, because I have always assumed
> Slothrop was only there in London at that desk at ACHTUNG a shorter time
> than the time he knew Tantivy. About a year maybe, Mr. Internalizer
> self-jokes.
>
> P. 22 Miller edition of GR: "..and Tantivy about to laugh or snort oh God
> across the wood Atlantic of their table."
> "Atlantics aplenty there have been these three years, often rougher, etc"
>  ...
> I have read this, perhaps superficially, as indicating many desks (or
> distances) over those three years.
>
> Here is a snippet where Slade's time assertion is mentioned. Neither in
> this snippet, nor in the blurring of possible memory, can I remember if it
> is backed up or simply assumed in his book.
> ---
> https://books.google.com/books?id=pUH_AQAAQBAJ&pg=PA70&dq=When+was+Slothrop+in+London?&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjHnLurpvrLAhXC5CYKHf5zCOgQ6AEIPTAE#v=onepage&q=When%20was%20Slothrop%20in%20London%3F&f=false
>
> Since The Blitz usually refers, it seems, to all the sorties, I have
> assumed Slothrop is here seeing the V-2 bombings as a 'second Blitz'
> although I guess History distinguishes differently.
>
> War, bombardment, blurs the mind almost totally, one might say as we meet
> the war-harried, mostly worried Slothrop.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Monte Davis <montedavis49 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "A lot of stuff prior to 1944 is getting blurry now. He can remember the
>> first Blitz only as a long spell of good luck."
>>
>> So Slothrop was in London for the first Blitz, usually dated 7 Sep 1940
>> to 11 May 1941, heaviest for the first 2-3 months. That means a minimum of
>> 3 1/2 years -- 4 yrs and 2 months if he witnessed the whole thing, which is
>> closer to the feeling I get here.
>>
>> Keep in mind that the US didn't enter WWII until Dec 1941... Lend-Lease
>> cooperation began after Mar 1941... and even the dodgy swap of US
>> destroyers for rights at UK bases in the Western Hemisphere was Sep 1940.
>>
>> Compare also to "these three years" farther down the page, applied to
>> Slothrop's friendship with Tantivy and the shared office at ACHTUNG. Which
>> would take that back to Nov. 1941, again before US entry into the war and
>> *long* before -- historically -- there was any special focus on "technical
>> intelligence" re "Northern Germany," i.e. V-2s.
>>
>> No note on this discrepancy -- or at least loose end -- at the Pynchon
>> Wiki or in Weisenburger's Companion.
>>
>> So... Does GR explain anywhere what US Army Lt. Slothrop was *doing* in
>> London in 1940-1941? It's not necessarily a ***CLUE*** - even without
>> formal alliance, even in peacetime, likely allies with shared strategic
>> concerns often maintain small military missions in each other's capitals.
>>
>> But given what we'll later learn about plans for Slothrop going way
>> back... maybe we're *supposed* to wonder about it, hmmm?
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20160406/77260e96/attachment.html>