Sartre and Stockhausen in TP

[David Morris]

Here the concept of "living it" is contrasted with "experiencing it."  And
living is matched with creating.  So living/creating is somehow divorced
from experiencing. And satire is linked to experiencing, I guess
vicariously, and reacting without creating.

This is a mine field construction of illogic, and it seems a juvenile one,
a product of a thought process that matures in GR.

David Morris

On Tuesday, August 2, 2016, Danny Weltman <danny.weltman at gmail.com> wrote:

> From V:
>
> "Oncue I will say it, is all: that Crew does not live, it experiences. It
> does not create, it talks about people who do. Varese, Ionesco, de Kooning,
> Wittgenstein, I could puke. It satirizes itself and doesn't mean it. Time
> magazine takes it seriously and does mean it."
>
> Danny
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:17 AM, matthew cissell <mccissell at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mccissell at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Hello P-listers,
>>
>> I come again to the avail of your collective intelligence and memory,
>> because... what was I saying?
>>
>> Oh yeah, I remember. I could swear that I read a line in Pynchon where
>> somebody sez sumthin like: "...Sartre, Stockhasuen, I could vomit." Not
>> verbatim but you get the idea.
>>
>> Does that sound familiar or is it just me transferring literary bits
>> around?
>> I thought it was in V. but my searches have come up empty.
>>
>> Thanks
>> mc otis
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20160802/cb04c642/attachment.html>