NP - This Xmas Season's Movies

[Rob Miller]

Anyone here seen Fences? Been meaning to go see that...
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:19 PM David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes.  The ending of OA sucked, and started sucking in the 2nd to last
> episode.  This is too bad, because it probably coulda have had more
> Seasons.  It had painted itself into a corner, but in Scifi and comic
> books, it is always possible to overcome the impossible with more fantastic
> new premises.  But then, ultimately, the goose has to come home to be
> cooked...  Unless it doesn't ever do that, ie. come home.
>
> David Morris
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 8:01 PM, kelber at mindspring.com <
> kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> A poorly- constructed sentence on my part. I was referring to the ending
> of The OA, not the ending of Manchester By the Sea.
>
> LK
>
> *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID*
>
>
> Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The ending of MANCHESTER-by-the-Sea is perfect. Thematically resonant as
> tubular bells.
> REAL Chekhovian likeness, so to speak.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Dec 28, 2016, at 5:56 PM, "kelber at mindspring.com" <
> kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> Most of the reviews warn that the ending sucks, but on Mr. Morris's
> recommendation, I've been watching The OA, on Netflix. Enthralling
> story-telling, even if it turns out to be just a shaggy-dog story.
>
> LK
>
> *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID*
>
>
> Allan Balliett <allan.balliett at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Re: Manchester by the Sea.
> while it qualified for my highest accolade (I didn't leave the auditorium
> to pee even once even though I was in an Alamo theater) I was so perplexed
> (or underwhelmed?) by the ending that I'm not recommending the film
>
> But i sure enjoyed Casey on SNL the other night!!
>
> Looking forward to the new tv Sherlock next week!
>
> Allan in WV
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 10:38 AM kelber at mindspring.com <
> kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> The trailer certainly makes it look like a by-the-numbers guy-weepy (ya
> know, like Shawshank Redemption). Is it drastically different from what's
> shown in the previews? I stay far, far away from weepies of any variety.
>
> Laura
>
> *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID*
>
>
> Jim Frame <jbframe at aol.com> wrote:
>
> Not everyone liked it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
>
> From: Joe Allonby <joeallonby at gmail.com>
>
>
> To: David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>
>
>
> Cc: P-list <pynchon-l at waste.org>
>
>
> Sent: Wed, Dec 28, 2016 2:31 am
>
>
> Subject: Re: NP - This Xmas Season's Movies
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Why is the title misleading or ironic? It's the name of a town.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 11:23 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I just saw Manchester by the Sea.  It is a finely-crafted tale that jerked
> many tears from this sap.  Beside the great acting, its best feature is the
> telling of its story via seamless meshing of past with present.  This
> meshing makes us quickly love and care for all the characters presented,
> but especially for the main one, a deeply broken man who always soldiers on
> through his great pain.  Highly recommended.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The film's title is a misleading irony.  It is a spoof.  This ain't
> Masterpiece Theater.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> David Morris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20161230/816bcdf0/attachment.html>