NP: Q re Jung Order

[Mark Kohut]

I have been revising my memories. I think New Age was later than the late
sixties as the phases
of my life merge like ice and snow. yes, woo woo hit pittsburgh in 70s, I
now think

So, I believe wikipedia is right (although as we know from etymology re
many words, may words were spoken
before we know they were spoken by the traces we can detect that they could
only leave by markers, usu
print, of some kind.)

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Mike Weaver <mike.weaver at zen.co.uk> wrote:

> Alan,
> Probably a good place to look for an answer to the first, if not both your
> questions, would be an archive of the UK magazine Resurgence.
> The wiki article on the term 'New Age' says the debate is between the
> early and late 1970s. I'd guess later myself, but Resurgence started
> publishing in 1966 so a methodical look through would surely reveal the
> answer.
>
>
> Allan Balliett <allan.balliett at gmail.com> wrote :
>
> > Fond of the WooMark Kohut -  Here are a couple of questions that only
> you can answer: When did "New Age" become a publisher's
> category? More importantly for my consideration, when did New Age book
> advertisements start featuring the smiling faces of their authors rather
> than inspirational images? Landmark dates in the evolution of inductive
> reasoning, I'd assume.Myself, I was an early adaptor, subscribing to
> mail order Rosicrucian teachings before I was out of High School, well
> before I ever heard the name "Sandoz."Allan in WV 'Here,
> here's proof: concentrate on the needle floating on the surface of the
> water in this glass...'On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Ian Livingston
> <
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20160216/06c8b7c1/attachment.html>