Jung. Synchronicity.& coincidences..."so who came around the corner"---AtD
Mark Kohut
mark.kohut at gmail.com
Wed Feb 24 04:10:08 CST 2016
So, guess you did not read because....
Since it is only Jung's definition of synchronicity quoted herein, on non-causal association, I don' t think the accusation of explaining away applies. If you did not get to the author's unexplained experience(s).
I'll read the second para again after coffee, but talk about a non-explanation......and oblique associationism......
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 23, 2016, at 6:45 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When anyone tries to explain the "meaning" of coincidence (AKA Synchronicity), I loose interest. "Explain" means explain away, discount, but usually with a lozenge of silliness.
>
> Allowing for the possibility of metaphysics is as hard as allowing that the Republican Party has gone batshit crazy, and that "Both-siderism" of MSM is bullshit. Evidence abounds, but allowing that consideration is threatening to the accepted model of reality, in mainstream circles. Reality bites. False narratives will always fail.
>
> David Morris
>
>> On Tuesday, February 23, 2016, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>> http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/02/the-true-meaning-of-coincidences/463164/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20160224/5e89b4a1/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list