You never did

[David Morris]

Why must we conceptualize something called "internet art?"  It seems an
argument based on a a shaky premise.  Technologies exist.  They may be
used, but the art produced isn't an art of the technology, unless that's
what the artist wants it to be.  The emergence of a technology doesn't
imply the emergence of a new category of art, unless one wants to make it
so.

David Morris

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Perry Noid <coolwithdoc at gmail.com> wrote:

> A--and the rainbow planes look like the Vintage paperback cover to GR
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 2:28 PM, John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is a great short video on internet art with heavy reference to
>> Pynchon. Worth a watch. Thanks Toby.
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Toby Levy <tobyglevy at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> https://aeon.co/videos/digital-art-can-help-us-see-and-judge-the-internet-before-it-consumes-everything
>> -
>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20160122/38d9abd8/attachment.html>