GR translation: and even closer to true north

[Mike Jing]

Sorry about the inaccurate subject.  It's reflex by now and the main
purpose for the translation tag is to filter these messages automatically
for archiving.

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:39 AM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:

> All ot these musings are not "translation," are they?  But they are fun.
>
> David Morris
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Monte Davis <montedavis49 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Norwich would certainly be a more northerly bearing (from any site) than
>> London. Walcheren is south of the Netherlands site we see most of (near the
>> Hague), but Staveren (or Stavoren) is north of it. I don't know enough
>> about the distribution of all the other launching sites to be sure, but I
>> get the same impression you do: the ones picked out here wouldn't pull the
>> vector sum of 3000+ operational firings of the A4 north much, if at all.
>> (Most of the ~300 test launches *were* north-ish from Peenemunde over the
>> Baltic, but that doesn't seem enough either)
>>
>> More broadly: as many USAans (and some UKers) forget because of parochial
>> pop history, Antwerp was hit more than all UK and other targets put
>> together. As it's south of almost all the Netherlands and much of northern
>> Germany, my gut tells me the vector sum would be so near W or even WSW
>>  that *nothing*could get it near 354, let alone 360.
>>
>> You may have caught TRP in some fudging (conscious or unconscious) to
>> link the mathematical resultant to the symbolic North he works up for
>> German (and Herero) mythology. Or he may be showing us the Counterforce
>> *fooling themselves* to align data with pre-existing beliefs, the way
>> ACHTUNG/White Visitation (and most readers) fool themselves about
>> Slothrop's map stars as evidence for penile precognition.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Mike Jing <gravitys.rainbow.cn at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> V707.6-15, P721.7-16   So the conferees at the Gross Suckling Conference
>>> here, as it will come to be known, sit around a map with their instruments,
>>> cigarettes and speculations. Sneer not. Here is one of the great deductive
>>> moments in postwar intelligence. Mexico is holding out for a weighting
>>> system to make vector lengths proportional to the actual number of firings
>>> along each one. Thomas Gwenhidwy, ever sensitive to events in geographical
>>> space, wants to take the 1944 Blizna firings (also eastward) into account,
>>> which would pull the arrow northward from 354°—and even closer to true
>>> north if the firings at London and Norwich from Walcheren and Staveren are
>>> also included.
>>>
>>> The Blizna firings are eastward, "which would pull the arrow northward
>>> from 354°".  But the the firings at London and Norwich from Walcheren and
>>> Staveren are westward, so how do they pull the arrow "even closer to true
>>> north"?
>>>
>>> I guess this makes sense if the Blizna firings pulls the arrow too much
>>> towards the east, and the westward firings would correct that.  However,
>>> the real "resultant" of all these firings should point towards south, while
>>> the missing arrow would be the opposite of the resultant.  In that case,
>>> the eastward firings would actually pull the missing bearing westward.  Am
>>> I getting this all wrong?
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20160125/550bacb2/attachment.html>