(np) What the Slaughter of Christians in Lahore Says About the Global Jihad
Kai Frederik Lorentzen
lorentzen at hotmail.de
Tue Mar 29 05:27:36 CDT 2016
Maajid Nawaz:
> ... A jihadist guerrilla war is being waged against world order, and
the international community is woefully unprepared to address the problem.
Many still deny this insurgency exists, and it is true that these
countries have locally specific factors that contribute to their
respective insurgent conditions. Yes, the groups behind these attacks
are not under one central leadership, rather they are either affiliates
or offshoots of competing jihadist groups.
But they all share one cause.
They are all—including ISIS—derived from, or affiliated to just two
jihadist groupings: al Qaeda and the Taliban. In turn, jihadists all
drink from the same doctrinal well of widespread, rigid Wahhabism. And
they share the ideological aims of popular non-terrorist Islamists. They
are all unified behind a theocratic desire to enforce a version of
Sharia as law over society. Considering that non-violent Wahhabi and
Islamist Muslims exist in their millions globally, this drastically
increases the potential recruitment pool for jihadists. The insurgency
could not succeed were this not so. There is no use in denying it.
For many years, liberals—and I speak as one—have refused to acknowledge
the ideology of Islamism. All talk of “ideas” was seen to be nothing but
a “neocon” line taken directly from the worst excesses of the George W.
Bush years.
Ironically, due to this very fear of political incorrectness we wound up
repeating many of the mistakes of the neocon era. While we feared to
engage in a debate on values with Muslim communities, we tried to
restrict the problem to the realm of mere criminality, as something to
be dealt with by law enforcement or, failing a solution there, by the
military—and ultimately by war, even if that word went unspoken. Under
this doctrine, President Barack Obama developed a secret kill-list,
preferring simply to assassinate his enemies, even if they were American
citizens, and he has dispatching more drone strikes abroad than Bush
ever did.
/Anything/ to avoid discussing ideas.
And so, as this global jihadist insurgency became impossible to ignore,
we liberals reluctantly, euphemistically began naming the problem
“violent extremism.” We used nauseating, limp State Department-coined
phrases such as “al-Qaeda-inspired extremism” to refer to what was
clearly an ideology. But as the assassination of Osama Bin Laden in his
Pakistani hideout proved, we cannot arrest nor shoot our way out of this
problem. “Defeating” al Qaeda was only ever going to give rise to a
group like ISIS, because it was not al Qaeda that had “inspired
extremism”; it was extremism that had inspired al Qaeda.
Our failure to recognize this as a civilizational struggle—one centered
around /values/—has allowed the fundamentalist problem of Wahhabism, and
the political problem of Islamism, to fester and metastasize. This
struggle is an ideological one before it is a military or legal one.
Vague platitudes that this has nothing to do with Islam—my own
religion—are as unhelpful as saying that this is the essence of Islam.
Extremism certainly has something to do with Islam. Not nothing, not
everything, but something.
The Lahore bombing underscores the very religious character of the
jihadists’ fanaticism. This was not about alienation in a European
ghetto, or revenge for American and European airstrikes in the Middle
East— the secular-sounding explanations offered as the motivations of
people like those who carried out the Paris and Brussels attacks. Lahore
was about pure, vicious religious intolerance, killing
Christians—including Christian children—on Easter Sunday because they
were Christians and not the kind of Muslims the murderers claim to be ... <
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/28/what-the-slaughter-of-christians-in-lahore-says-about-the-global-jihad.html?via=twitter_page
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20160329/e5c46240/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list