Mushrooms & Bananas
Mark Kohut
mark.kohut at gmail.com
Thu Mar 31 07:23:55 CDT 2016
Thanks Laura for the vote of confidence and as Jack Benny famously said,
"I'm thinking, I'm thinking".
Right now I'll let others show me the answer so I don't have to figure it
out.
Go List!
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:43 PM, <kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:
> I don't think anyone can dispute that Pynchon equates Nature with Good,
> and fucking with Nature as Bad. But then one can quibble with what
> constitutes fucking with Nature: small farming, rooftop cultivations?
> Doesn't seem likely. But those rooftop bananas are unnaturally large. And
> the mushrooms - Osbie Feels' pharmaceutical plants - also, are apparently
> unnatural. I'm on the fence, despite my previous posts, over whether it's
> meant as magical realism or hints of a darker don't-fuck-with-nature
> variety. I don't think there's anything wrong - this is Pynchon! - in
> reading both simultaneously. But I lean towards the darker view.
>
> I see GR as Pynchon's attempt to find that point - zero point, point of no
> return, Brennschluss - where the Cold War was set in motion. He knew, of
> course, that he'd have to go back much earlier. In GR, it's already too
> late. In ATD and M&D he digs deeper. I can't offhand think of any examples,
> but it seems to me that in ATD, he's presenting alternate routes that might
> have been taken - Tesla, the Quaternions - Mark K., can you help here? Even
> in Bleeding Edge, there's at least a vision of what might have been.
>
> I don't see any such alternate-path moments in GR. It's strictly about
> things that DID happen. He's bringing in chemistry to present a whole
> 'nother level of fucking with Nature - at the molecular level - and it
> hangs like a cloud over everything (well, for me, anyway).
>
> Laura
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Kai Frederik Lorentzen
>
> Sent: Mar 30, 2016 5:14 AM
>
> To: pynchon -l
>
> Subject: Mushrooms & Bananas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On the question whether the banana breakfast - in general: the
> farming on the roof - is a good counter-cultural "Fuck Death!", or
> in itself just an artificial and synthetic strategy of
> death-orientated survival.
>
>
>
> On pp. 92-93, Katje just entered the scene, it says: "She's alone
> in the house, except for the secret cameraman and Osbie Feel, who's
> out in the kitchen doing something mysterious with a harvest of
> mushrooms from up on the roof. They have shiny red-orange cups with
> raised patches of whitish-gray veil. Now and then the geometry of
> her restlessness brings her to glance in a doorway at his boyish
> fussing with the Amanita muscaria (for it is this peculiar
> relative of poisonous Destroying Angel that claims Osbie's
> attention, or what passes with him for attention)---flash him a
> smile she means to be friendly, but which to Osbie seems terribly
> worldly, sophisticated, wicked."
>
>
>
> Thing just is that in the case of Amanita muscaria (dt.
> "Fliegenpilz"), in contrary to the magic mushrooms of the psilocybin
> type, it's not possible to cultivate it in artificial surroundings.
> According to my knowledge, you cannot grow these mushrooms in
> greenhouses or boxes! They can only grow in conjunction with a
> living tree. "Amanita cultivation in a lab environment has always
> been a frustrating prospect due to the symbiotic relationship of
> this mushroom to its host trees, most of which are Birch trees that
> occur naturally in the wild. But if one has the right host trees in
> their area, and resides in the proper temperate zone or elevation,
> one can try and simply take a few dried or fresh caps that are in
> sporination (fully flattened or upturning with longitudinal tears
> along the striations), crush them up thoroughly, and mix the crushed
> pieces into the top soil. See if it will take. If one doesn’t want
> to make the initial investment of the caps simply chop up the stems
> from sporinating specimens, which will naturally have collected some
> of the falling spores, and mix with the soil"
> (amanita-shop.com/amanita-cultivation). So what you need is a
> garden, a greenhouse on the roof won't do it.
>
>
>
> I'm not sure what to make of this. Did Pynchon know about the
> impossibility to grow Amanita muscaria the way he describes it and
> thought "Hey, a little magic realism cannot do any harm". If so, the
> whole farming on the roof motif, including the initial banana
> breakfast, could indeed be read as basically positive. It's so very
> counter-cultural and "Fuck Death!" that it even makes Amanita
> muscaria grow without any birch or pine tree around ... But if
> Pynchon actually knew about the impossibility, a reading along the
> lines of Laura's skepticism regarding the motif of good nature in
> Pynchon would also make sense. Then the cultivation appears be
> another example of war ridden science going beyond the zero by
> practicing something which appeared (and still appears) to be
> impossible. What fits this reading is the fact that the effects of
> Amanita muscaria are actually not so much psychedelic yet deliriant,
> dissociative and sedative-hypnotic. Via the early use by Siberian
> shamans the mushroom is associated with the north. Not exactly the
> direction of the sky Pynchon favors in terms of his cultural
> cosmology.
>
>
>
> Does Osbie Feel - "He leads her to a back room fitted out with
> telephones, a cork board with notes pinned all over, desks littered
> with maps, schedules, An Introduction to Modern Herero,
> corporate histories, spools of recording wire" (p. 536) - somehow
> represent Pynchon himself?
> -
> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?listpynchon-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20160331/b83e195f/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list