Fake News (Lies) is....
Joseph Tracy
brook7 at sover.net
Fri Aug 18 22:24:09 CDT 2017
Really good contextualization. This decontextualization has been a frequent tactic of the right in recent decades and is a specialty of ideologues of many persuasions. The idea is always to put words in the mouths of those you disagree with tater than try to understand waht they are sayin. Where there is profudity in Marx, and I think he has some wrong-headed projections of how change might come, but where there is a deep truth was in his understanding and empathy with those suffering most under industrial capitalism. I’m going to save this for my little book of quotes.
> On Aug 18, 2017, at 11:03 AM, ish mailian <ishmailian at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> "[fill in the blank] is the opiate of the people."
>
> It's worth re-reading Marx to see what he meant when he famously said,
> "It is the opium of the people."
>
> Quoted like this, or, as is most often the case, with the antecedent
> noun, Religion, in place of the pronoun, most readers assume that the
> statement is fairly straightforward and simple.
>
> Religion is the opium of the people.
>
> Substituting other words or phrases has given the weight of Marx's
> statement to whatever a writer elects to compare with religion.
>
> A close look at the original text reveals that the pronoun "it" as
> used by Marx carries far more than its immediate antecedent or
> religion.
>
> In fact, as Marx says from the beginning of his essay, the critique of
> religion, while essential, a prerequisite to all criticism, is
> complete.
>
> So is the famous sentence synoptic, a repetition for emphasis, or what?
>
>
> First, Marx restates the critique of religion with confidence and finality.
>
> The opium sentence that follows the summary of the critique is not
> synoptic and it does not merely add a flair of emphasis, an emphatic
> metaphor.
>
> The sentence is about suffering, the real suffering of the oppressed
> and the protest against suffering.
>
> Here is what Marx wrote:
>
> "Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of
> real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the
> sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and
> the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people."
>
> When read with its preceding sentences the statement is not only more
> profound, it is more germane to us, to our suffering, how we express
> it and how we protest against it.
>
> When we read the famous statement with words substituted for the word
> religion we do well to recall the original context and what it is Marx
> identifies. The opium or opiate epidemic plaguing the American white
> working classes is an expression of suffering, of despair, and a
> protest against the suffering, the losses of white privilege.
>
> Marx writes:
> "To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is
> to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions."
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:39 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ...the opiate of the people.
> -
> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list