GR translation: shearing alongside for miles

[David Morris]

Not to kill this buzz, but P's pornagraphy of flight was about the
infinitely smaller approximations that measured and predicted a flight
trajectory ruled by Gravity.  As I remember, the slicing of reality, Delta
Ts,  into measured moments, and eventually,  potentially,artificially
reproduced phenomenon, as in a film projection, or a programmed human, was
what he meant by pornography in GR: was that Algebra or Trig? In P's world,
analysis is a degrading process, a pornography born of our fatal need to
CONTROL.

David Morris

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:55 PM Monte Davis <montedavis49 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Only if you're perverted enough to imagine the air sliding delicately
> around the thrusting fuselage, trailing languidly over the sensuous curve
> of the airfoil, forming tickling little whorls in every declivity. I
> couldn't possibly comment.
>
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:47 AM, rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 'I may be stretching here, but I wouldn't put it past P. to have in mind
>> that the whole picture of successive sliding layers -- foundation of
>> aerodynamics for  decades before 1945 -- is a *fiction* for mathematical
>> tractability'
>>
>> is that partly what the 'pornography of flight' is possibly alluding to,
>> Monte?
>>
>> rich
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Monte Davis <montedavis49 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ​Closest to "wind shear" in meteorology or aviation: notional layers of
>>> a fluid (gas or liquid) moving adjacent to each other at different
>>> velocities, with momentum transferred more or less smoothly between them at
>>> the interface -- turbulence arises (i.e. the layers mix and tangle into
>>> vortices) if the velocity difference is too great. (For me, this also harks
>>> back to Achtfaden & co. and the "boundary layer" at the skin of an A4 as it
>>> moves through the air.) The same applies to convection currents in a heated
>>> cauldron: look at a patch of oil or fat sliding across the surface.
>>>
>>> I may be stretching here, but I wouldn't put it past P. to have in mind
>>> that the whole picture of successive sliding layers -- foundation of
>>> aerodynamics for  decades before 1945 -- is a *fiction* for mathematical
>>> tractability, the reality being uncountable gas molecules moving with all
>>> speeds and velocities in all directions, the layers emerging only as
>>> statistics. Maybe there's a hint that the tribal/ethnic labels are also
>>> fictions? That after their near-death experience as victims of abstraction
>>> and systematization, the "Czechs" and "Slovaks" streaming along side by
>>> side might be better off as individual I and Thou?
>>>
>>> Anyway... look back to your Peenemunde passages, and if possible
>>> translate "shearing" with a technical flavor, maybe whatever a Chinese
>>> weather forecaster uses for "wind shear"
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Mike Jing <
>>> gravitys.rainbow.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> V549.28-36, P559.5-13   . . . Sudetens and East Prussians shuttling
>>>> between Berlin and the DP camps in Mecklenburg, Czechs and Slovaks, Croats
>>>> and Serbs, Tosks and Ghegs, Macedonians, Magyars, Vlachs, Circassians,
>>>> Spaniols, Bulgars stirred and streaming over the surface of the Imperial
>>>> cauldron, colliding, shearing alongside for miles, sliding away, numb,
>>>> indifferent to all momenta but the deepest, the instability too far below
>>>> their itchy feet to give a shape to, white wrists and ankles incredibly
>>>> wasted poking from their striped prison-camp pajamas, footsteps light as
>>>> waterfowl’s in this inland dust . . .
>>>>
>>>> What does "shearing" mean here?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20170726/a9a8e7d5/attachment.html>