Re: ‘King Arthur’ Movie Falls on Its Sword in Opening Weekend - WSJ

[Robert Mahnke]

Easier to borrow someone else's opinions than to think for oneself?

It wasn't a great movie but I kinda liked it, and wouldn't have gone but for this thread. Maybe I don't get out enough. 

Sent from an iPhone; pls xcse typos. 

> On May 14, 2017, at 16:55, Laura <laurakelber at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Just saw King Arthur today, and while I liked the London gangster elements Ritchie imported from his other movies, they weren't enough to prevent this from being a standard-issue crappy action flick with obvious plot points, ludicrous characters and boring CGI.
> 
> That being said, I don't see any particular reason why the critics should pile on this one and rave about similarly-schlocky action pix du jour. It sure seems like they're getting paid to rave, at times. Is there some secretive Scarsdale Vibe pulling the strings? Or just collective cowardice?
> 
> Laura
> 
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
> 
> 
> Allan Balliett <allan.balliett at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I saw a similar story on Friday, which caused me to believe the Hollywood system wants to kill it
> 
> Think of Costner's Water World
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 4:11 PM Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hurry, it's bleeding to death.
>> 
>> https://www.wsj.com/articles/king-arthur-movie-falls-on-its-sword-in-opening-weekend-1494786805?mod=e2tw
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20170514/5542e91a/attachment.html>