MD Read?

[Mark Thibodeau]

Maybe we could organize it more tightly and not assign specific guides - or
at least, single guides? Like maybe we could do a set amount of pages - two
or three, or whatever the form of the work dictates - and then devote the
first pass to questions raised, then follow up with answers and speculation?

On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:

> I just had this way out, won't be universally liked idea re the M & D
> Read. We can let it happen, Iceland-spar
> like, on two tracks. 1) from the beginning 2) from where the last ended OR
> from the end backward.
>
> One thing that invariably happens with Group Reads since, maybe, Against
> the Day, is that people write posts that
> analyze, elucidate, riff in larger real world ways about the whole work
> beyond the selected pages being hosted.
>
> So, why not double down. So to Speak.
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am always up for a Group Read. The last M & D Read disappeared like
>> Slothrop when I stopped talking to myself on line.
>>
>> I will find and repeat myself some.
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:04 PM, da kid <peterock86 at live.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Would you all be up for a group read and discussion of Mason and Dixon?
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20171001/2d8e0221/attachment.html>