MD Read?

[Mark Kohut]

A sort of self-organized 'anarchy' read under that definition of anarchy.

I like it so I hope if we do almost everyone jumps into the dance.

On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Mark Thibodeau <jerkyleboeuf at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Maybe we could organize it more tightly and not assign specific guides -
> or at least, single guides? Like maybe we could do a set amount of pages -
> two or three, or whatever the form of the work dictates - and then devote
> the first pass to questions raised, then follow up with answers and
> speculation?
>
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just had this way out, won't be universally liked idea re the M & D
>> Read. We can let it happen, Iceland-spar
>> like, on two tracks. 1) from the beginning 2) from where the last ended
>> OR from the end backward.
>>
>> One thing that invariably happens with Group Reads since, maybe, Against
>> the Day, is that people write posts that
>> analyze, elucidate, riff in larger real world ways about the whole work
>> beyond the selected pages being hosted.
>>
>> So, why not double down. So to Speak.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am always up for a Group Read. The last M & D Read disappeared like
>>> Slothrop when I stopped talking to myself on line.
>>>
>>> I will find and repeat myself some.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:04 PM, da kid <peterock86 at live.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Would you all be up for a group read and discussion of Mason and Dixon?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20171001/a8b28bd9/attachment.html>