Kennedy Ice- up for grabs

[Becky Lindroos]

If elections go to straight popular vote (or equal population ratios for states), who’s going to bother even listening to the concerns to any rural area,  much less visiting?  Will farm policies count anymore?  Will commodities and farm land be heavily taxed - drop all those stupid subsidies to farmers?   (Well, duh, who cares? Their scattered votes don’t count like the votes of millions of people concerned with prices and urban housing and transport.)   

Nowhere near all farmers are anything like big business - many barely get by with both mom and pop doing other jobs like teaching and equipment repair.  The prices they get are pretty well determined by big business (grain and bean buyers).   It’s coming though, big business farms will rule if enough big city people want to stop rural US from getting a vote which actually counts.   (ironic heh) 

Note -  I’m kind of on the fence about this, but my family has been involved in farming (North Dakota no less) one farm since 1876), about 6  generations plus one growing up.  It got divided up so it’s not a big farm now.  Family farms tend to sell out after about the 3rd generation, but this one and many others like it haven’t!  My daughter and son-in-law farm it (while working as a teacher and a mechanic).   It would be so cool if my granddaughters decided try it. One might but she’s still only 11. lol - 

Becky
https://beckylindroos.wordpress.com

> On Nov 8, 2018, at 6:19 AM, jody2.718 <jody2.718 at protonmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The future is cute and cuddly, but every time grandma tries to grab a hold of the "little bargain" he just seems to melt away. The U.S. Senate, however, now there's a real bargain.
> 
> North Dakota- pop.,  755,393, and Two senators
> California- pop.,  39,536,653, and Two senators
> Ratio-  about 52 : 1
> 
> In Senatorial Mathematics, each person from North Dakota is worth 52+ Californians.
> 
> Excuse me while I dust off my degree in rocket science, but in terms of power, why would anyone even bother trying to persuade the voting percentage of 39.5 million people in California to vote for them when the same effect could be had by persuading 2 percent of that many in North Dakota?
> 
> 322,613 people voted in North Dakota for the senatorial race. In California, no senate seats up for re-election, but 7,140,132 people voted for the governorship.  On a percentage basis the turnout was way higher in North Dakota- almost 43 % of the estimated 2017 population (hard to believe, actually), while in California,  about 20% of the estimated 2017 population voted for governor. Still, 51% of 322,613 in N.D. needed to control a senate seat, or about 165,000 votes, versus 51% of the estimated 7,140,132 voting public, or, about 3,641,500, in California- 22 times as many votes needed in California to control a senate seat.
> 
> Where would you spend your money?
> 
> "Does Dellman's sell Shoes?"
> 
> [Population estimates- Wikipedia.  Voting numbers- Washington Post]
> 
> jody
> 
> Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> --
> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l