Mueller probe a dud?

[Mark Thibodeau]

Do I detect a hint of barely restrained, spiteful delight in your missive?

J.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 11:34 PM Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net> wrote:
>
> https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/19/mueller-investigation-findings-914754 <https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/19/mueller-investigation-findings-914754>Here are the 1st few paragraphs of a recent article in politico
> MUELLER INVESTIGATION
> Mueller report PSA: Prepare for disappointmentAnd be forewarned that the special counsel’s findings may never be made public.
>
> By DARREN SAMUELSOHN 10/19/2018 05:20 AM EDT
>
> President Donald Trump's critics have spent the past 17 months anticipating what some expect will be among the most thrilling events of their lives: special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report on Russian 2016 election interference.
> They may be in for a disappointment.
> That’s the word POLITICO got from defense lawyers working on the Russia probe and more than 15 former government officials with investigation experience spanning Watergate to the 2016 election case. The public, they say, shouldn’t expect a comprehensive and presidency-wrecking account of Kremlin meddling and alleged obstruction of justice by Trump — not to mention an explanation of the myriad subplots that have bedeviled lawmakers, journalists and
> amateur Mueller sleuths.
> Perhaps most unsatisfying: Mueller’s findings may never even see the light of day………
>
>
> --
> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l