Russian Collusion

[Roger Mexico]

Thanks.

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:05 AM John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com> wrote:

> A copy seems to be hosted on someone's page at Le Sorbonne. Can't
> vouch for the source:
>
> http://www.tal.univ-paris3.fr/plurital//travaux-2013-2014/projets-2013-2014-S1/groupe_11_septembre/pages-aspirees/anglais.txt18.html
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Roger Mexico
> <rogerantimexico at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Any way of viewing this review for free?
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 10:12 PM jody2.718 <jody2.718 at protonmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Well, David, Hersh used to have some credibility back when The Paper of
> >> Record was fronting Judith Miller, and the Pakistani Inter-Services
> >> Intelligence Directorate (ISI) was helping Bin Laden, et. al., escape
> from
> >> Afghanistan-  much water under the dam since then. And frankly, I don't
> >> think that if Trump, himself, signed on to the P-list and began
> proclaiming
> >> that the Russian investigation was a CIA con job, it would influence the
> >> Mueller Investigation too much, do you?
> >>
> >> I'm much more interested in discussing Bleeding Edge- an amazing
> >> achievement in American Letters. It's been seventeen years since 9/11,
> the
> >> time it took Joyce to complete Finnegan's Wake, and the effects are
> still
> >> rippling out from that momentous calamity. It may not have been The
> Fall,
> >> but it was the fall of the virtual American Hegemony in place since
> >> Hiroshima. You might also find that the very topics you're so concerned
> >> about, as Mr. Kohut has repeatedly implied, are foreshadowed in Bleeding
> >> Edge.
> >>
> >> I was able to get my hands on Michael Chabon's wonderful review of
> >> Bleeding Edge in the NY Review ([November 7, 2013 Issue](
> >> https://www.nybooks.com/issues/2013/11/07/)) today, and it confirms my
> >> belief that Bleeding Edge deserves more discussion (and praise) then
> it's
> >> gotten, especially here.
> >>
> >> jody
> >> ---------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> "Who gives a fuck about what "Hersh says"?  Or why should we?  Our lying
> >> eyes need more anti-eye-lies? We could spiral this dizzyness into
> complete
> >> inaction, couldn't we?"
> >>
> >> David Morris
> >> --
> >> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
> >>
> > --
> > Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>