More underestimation of the Russians ' effect on the 2016 US election and government

[rich]

PS I wouldnt worry too much about Russian interference or collusion. Trump
and his sad sack of cronies will end up tripping over their own
incompetence. the question is how much damage will be done in the interim.
It's so easy to believe in a deep state. but we need functioning
institutions more than ever

rich

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 1:32 PM rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:

> i think that award currently goes to Der Speigel (kidding) ;)
>
> rich
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:02 PM Thomas Eckhardt <
> thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de> wrote:
>
>> "Correction:
>>
>> A previous version of this article misidentified the people to whom Paul
>> Manafort wanted a Russian associate to send polling data. Mr. Manafort
>> wanted the data sent to two Ukrainian oligarchs, Serhiy Lyovochkin and
>> Rinat Akhmetov, not to Oleg V. Deripaska, a Russian oligarch close to
>> the Kremlin."
>>
>>
>> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/08/us/politics/manafort-trump-campaign-data-kilimnik.html
>>
>> Incompetence, surely.
>>
>>
>> Am 09.01.2019 um 16:03 schrieb Mark Kohut:
>> >       Caroline Orr (@RVAwonk)
>> > 1/8/19, 10:12 PM
>> > Per @nytimes (tonight), the polling data that Paul Manafort (and Rick
>> Gates) gave to Konstantin Kilimnik ultimately went to Oleg Deripaska, a
>> Putin ally to whom Manafort was deeply indebted. At one point, Manafort
>> offered to give Deripaska private briefings on the campaign.
>> twitter.com/TheLoyalO/stat…
>> >
>> > Download the Twitter app
>> >
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPhone
>> > --
>> > Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>> >
>> --
>> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>>
>