Great Thread on 5GW in Ukraine

Mark Kohut mark.kohut at gmail.com
Mon Oct 12 11:23:46 UTC 2020


I am not so nice with this last post, pace Jochen, because I do think it is
some kind of 'sin' to justify some monsters as you do. To simply not see
because of abstract beliefs.

You are smart enough not to, but you won't. IMAO  and only a premise not a
fact.

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:10 AM Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:

> You, of course, have no response to 1) the fact that you raised a
> conjecture to the level of fact 2) that Morales
> is not giving us reality with his offhand remark (evidently to one witness
> only)....
>
> Think again, Mr Eckhardt. Think Better. As Orwell once wrote,
> Sometimes the hardest thing to see is what is in
> front of one's eyes.
>
> I can get you in my class free if you would like. 9 AM EST USA. Mondays.
> We will be talking some Jill Lepore as well as Pierce and
> Dewey and Hersh's reporting....
>
> Relax,
>
> Mark
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 6:52 AM Thomas Eckhardt <
> thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de> wrote:
>
>> Am 12.10.2020 um 11:57 schrieb Mark Kohut:
>>
>> > I can also remember when you used to diss the Guardian's reporting (or
>> > was that the other guy?).
>>
>> Yes. I am very critical of the Guardian's reporting. But these are
>> statements on the legal record. That does not necessarily make them
>> true, but gives them some weight.
>>
>> > The CIA is never mentioned in this story. When I last took my socks off
>> > to count, the US had seventeen intelligence agencies. That's first.
>>
>> Yes. The CIA's involvement is at this point mere conjecture on my part.
>> On the other hand, I find it rather unlikely that the intelligence
>> service of the United States Coast Guard or the NSA considered poisoning
>> Mr. Assange in London.
>>
>>
>>


More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list