BEg2 Chap 8 Summary Part 1

[David Morris]

I’d like to make a couple observations about what is “clear” about Michael
Ruppert:

1.  Ruppert’s  promoting of 9/11 conspiracies has made him second only to
Alex Jones as a trusted source in wingnut circles.  I’m not familiar with
his theory about Israeli microchips and 9/11, but it must have been very
successful, because somehow Israelis later managed to also have their
microchips manufactured into the COVID-19 vaccines.

2.  If any forensic report of the collapse of WTC7 concludes that fire was
not the cause, *I would hope that report would then propose a more likely
cause for the collapse,* with all the same detail used to eliminate fire as
the cause.  But I don’t think that was included in the report.

The unstated implication of the report’s non-fire cause conclusion is that
the collapse could only otherwise have been caused by *Controlled
Demolition (CD), *making it an “inside job.”  The reason they don’t offer a
forensic analysis for how that might have been “pulled off,” is because* it
would have been impossible to do the pre-demo engineering/construction for
CD without being noticed*, especially since that was a fully occupied
office/hotel building at the time of the collapse.

*All it takes* to debunk that theory is for ANY controlled demolition
engineer to explain the physical details of what would be required for a
controlled demolition of that size.  I don’t think it would be possible to
find an opposing expert witness.

David Morris


On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 5:04 PM Huebschraeuber via Pynchon-l <
pynchon-l at waste.org> wrote:

> It is clear that one of Pynchon's sources for 9/11 is Michael Ruppert's
> "Crossing the Rubicon" because the story of the Israeli microchip can be
> found there, and only there (apart from Ruppert's online magazine "From
> the Wilderness" where it was published first).
>
> This also helps to explain why the biggest, let us say, mystery of 9/11
> is not mentioned in BE: The free-fall collapse of WTC7. It is not
> mentioned by Ruppert, iirc.
>
> "The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the
> collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and
> private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary
> conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global
> failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the
> building."
>
> https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
>