The Main Scientist behind MK-Ultra - a book recommendation

[Thomas Eckhardt]

Thanks, not much to argue here. I take the opportunity to state my 
arguments more precisely


> Nazi doctors are a different story. None of the doctors 
> involved in the LSD testing in the US MK-Ultra were former Nazi's or 
> even German. 

My point is that there is a direct line between the mescaline 
experiments in Nazi concentration camps to mescaline and LSD testing in 
MKULTRA. Which happens to be also what the author of the book you 
recommended wrote:

"[Scientists at Fort Detrick] spent many hours questioning German 
scientists about mescaline experiments that had been performed on 
prisoners at the Dachau concentration camp. (...) Gottlieb read piles of 
reports on these experiments." (59)

L. Wilson Greene, technical director of the Chemical and Radiological 
Laboratories at Edgewood Arsenal wrote his "Psychochemical Warfare: A 
New Concept of War" which "concluded with a strong recommendation that 
the government begin systematically testing LSD, mescaline, and sixty 
other mind-altering compounds that might be weaponized for use against 
enemy populations." (36)

Hilarius, of course, remembers working with new drugs to induce insanity 
in Buchenwald (COL49, Perennial Classics, 112).

(I also note in passing that on p. 117 the program to test LSD on 
suburban housewives is suddenly Hilarius' program which he has broadened 
"to include husbands" like Mucho.)

> It is quite a leap to think that because /some/ people 
> were aware of German scientists in the US that they would also know 
> about the attempt to get Blome into the US, which did not finally 
> happen. That includes TP.

My argument does not hinge on Blome. They got Strughold and Schreiber in 
the US and quite a few more. See Linda Hunt, "Secret Agenda", or:

https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/12/08/98078/

All in all, more than 1,600 Nazi scientists were shipped to the US.

> And allow me to clarify something: I didn't mean to minimize 
> Hilarius. 

No worries. I didn't think you did.

> In fact, I see this as part of an important trend through TP's 
> work, namely his clear targeting of anti-semiticism and racism. (This is 
> likely in part because of his closeness to the Meyerhof family with whom 
> he spent much time.) TP's portrayal is a grotesque ridicule of Hilarius. 
> And lest we forget, Hilarius is a dentist - not one of TP's favourite 
> professionals. The satirical treatment targets Hilarius and is meant to 
> do what satire does. Levitas does not mean one takes things lightly. 
> Look at the humour in /The Master and Marguerita/.

This is my reading as well. I particularly like two aspects that have 
nothing to do what we are discussing: That Hilarius is "put in charge of 
faces", and his discussion of Freudian and Jungian concepts of the 
subconscious.

> As I see it the two camps presented in this email chain are: my idea 
> that TP created the character of Hilarius without knowing about Blome or 
> Paperclip, it is a product of his own authorial project and his 
> particular habitus; the other view appears to be that in order to create 
> Hilarius he must have known somehow about these very top secret affairs.

Yes. I don't think he *must* have known, however, but believe it to be 
likely. Granted, I may have occasionally overstated my point.

> It is not impossible that TP was given such information, but it is 
> highly unlikely and therefore rather implausible. You wrote: "It should 
> have been impossible for him to even speculate that this kind of war 
> criminal was allowed to live in the US, no?" Not at all. In fact, this 
> is where we differ. 

Yes.

> I believe that writers do come up with things, and 
> they are sometimes true. Look at E.A. Poe's /Eureka/, in which he puts 
> forth an idea very similar to the Big Bang theory. Did he have some 
> prior knowledge? No, he was being imaginative and creative. Dreaming up 
> a dentist who is a Nazi war criminal that gives LSD to his patients 
> would have been easier for TP to do than obtain the information you 
> speculate that he had.

Which is perfectly comprehensible.

> It is difficult to determine where an artist has borrowed and recycled 
> or where they have spun from strands of dreams. Clearly, TP has done a 
> titanic amount of research. But is it not to his greater credit to 
> postulate that he thought up Hilarius without knowing about Blome, 
> Paperclip &/or MK-Ultra? Of course, I'm not here to convince you of that 
> or anything else. Proselytizing rarely works. Just sharing my view.

A respectful debate is always worthwhile. It is instructive, fun, and 
hopefully helps to keep Alzheimer's away.

Best,
Thomas